scholarly journals Dynamic Telecytology Compares Favorably to Rapid Onsite Evaluation of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspirates

2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 3092-3097 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Buxbaum ◽  
Mohamad A. Eloubeidi ◽  
Christianne J. Lane ◽  
Shyam Varadarajulu ◽  
Ami Linder ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1043-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie B. Sodikoff ◽  
Hunter L. Johnson ◽  
Melinda M. Lewis ◽  
Sagar S. Garud ◽  
Sheila J. Bharmal ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB327
Author(s):  
James L. Buxbaum ◽  
Isam Eltoum ◽  
Christianne J. Lane ◽  
Shyam Varadarajulu ◽  
Ami L. Linder ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 986-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario de Biase ◽  
Caterina de Luca ◽  
Gianluca Gragnano ◽  
Michela Visani ◽  
Claudio Bellevicine ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15726-e15726
Author(s):  
Dario De Biase ◽  
Caterina de Luca ◽  
Gianluca Gragnano ◽  
Umberto Malapelle ◽  
Giovanni Tallini ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 400-400
Author(s):  
Susan Tsai ◽  
Paul S. Ritch ◽  
Beth Erickson ◽  
Ben George ◽  
Fabian McCartney Johnston ◽  
...  

400 Background: Acquisition of pancreatic cancer (PC) tissue specimens from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirates (EUS-FNA) is crucial to investigational pancreatic cancer trials seeking to utilize molecular profile directed therapy. Methods: In an ongoing prospective clinical trial we have utilized molecular profiling of EUS-FNA specimens from patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancers. Cytologic specimens were evaluated for six biomarkers to guide the choice of neoadjuvant therapy: secreted protein acid rich in cysteine (SPARC), thymidylate synthase (TYMS), ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1), human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1), excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC), and topoisomerase 1 (TOPO). Final immunohistochemical (IHC) interpretation was scored by a single pathologist using both staining intensity and percent immunochemically reactive cells. Results: The trial has enrolled 99 patients to date; 47 (47%) resectable patients and 52 (52%) borderline resectable patients. No patient experienced a EUS-FNA related complication. IHC profiling was reported in a median of 5 business days (IQR:3). Of the 99 patient samples, 73 (74%) had adequate cellularity for IHC profiling and this was not affected by stage of disease (n = 35, resectable; n = 38 borderline resectable; p = 0.82). Analysis of SPARC expression was limited to specimens with adequate stromal cells for analysis (n = 50, 51%). Among the 73 patients with adequate tissue for profiling, expression profiling was interpreted to be favorable for the following therapeutic agents: nab-paclitaxel, (SPARC, n = 35, 48%), 5-fluorouracil (TYMS, n = 68, 93%), gemcitabine (RRM1, n = 34, 47%; ENT1, n = 38, 52%), platinum agents (ERCC, n = 30, 41%), and irinotecan (TOPO, n = 62, 85%). Conclusions: The use of EUS-FNA specimens for molecular diagnostics is feasible and IHC analysis was possible in 74% of patient specimens, with preservation of stromal components in over 50%. Further refinement of molecular techniques may expand the breadth of analysis which may be performed, to include quantitative polymerase chain reaction and genetic sequencing Clinical trial information: NCIT01726582.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document