The Impact of Product Market Competition on Employers’ Training Investments. Evidence from German Establishment Panel Data

De Economist ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Görlitz ◽  
Joel Stiebale
Keyword(s):  
Panel Data ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Establishment Panel Data

scholarly journals When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data

2002 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee G Branstetter ◽  
Mariko Sakakibara
Keyword(s):  
Panel Data ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Japanese Government ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Sponsored Research ◽  
Negatively Associated ◽  
The Impact

We examine the impact of a large number of Japanese government-sponsored research consortia on the research productivity of participating firms by measuring their patenting in the targeted technologies before, during, and after participation. Consistent with the predictions of the theoretical literature on research consortia, we find consortium outcomes are positively associated with the level of potential R&D spillovers within the consortium and (weakly) negatively associated with the degree of product market competition among consortium members. Furthermore, our evidence suggests that consortia are most effective when they focus on basic research.

Agency problems and the value of advertising expenditures in an emerging market: role of product market competition

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1123-1143
Author(s):  
Omar Farooq ◽  
Zakir Pashayev
Keyword(s):  
Positive Impact ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Agency Problems ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThis paper documents the impact of product market competition on the value of advertising expenditures.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use the data for non-financial firms from India and the pooled regression procedure to test their arguments during the period between 2009 and 2018.FindingsThe results show that advertising expenditures of firms operating in sectors with relatively high competition are more valuable than advertising expenditures of firms operating in sectors with relatively low competition. The results of the study are robust across various proxies of advertising expenditures and firm performance. Furthermore, the results also show that the positive impact of product market competition on the value of advertising expenditures is confined only to firms that already have lower agency problems.Originality/valueThe results of the study highlight the importance of product market competition on the value of advertising expenditure in the emerging market setting, where agency problems are supposed to be high.

Product market competition, cash flow and corporate investments

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussein Ali Ahmad Abdoh ◽  
Oscar Varela
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Growth Firms ◽  
Capital Spending ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of product market competition on capital spending (investments) financed by cash flow (CF), and the role of financial constraints (FC) on these effects. Design/methodology/approach The Herfindahl-Hirschman index of concentration measures competition. Earnings retention, working capital, the Kaplan and Zingales (1997) index and CF shortfalls measure FC. Regressions relating capital spending to competition are performed for the full sample, as well as financially constrained and unconstrained, and growth and value firms’ sub-samples. For robustness, large reductions in import tariffs are examined to exogenously measure competition, with the impact of these on capital spending tested via the difference-in-difference method. Findings The results show that competition fosters valuable investments when firms are financially unconstrained, especially for growth firms, and reduces these investments when they are financially constrained, especially for value firms. Practical implications The role of policy makers in alleviating FC should be focused toward growth firms that operate in competitive industries. As well, increasing financial pressure on value firms in competitive industries can have desirable effects, as it forces these firms to reduce investment inefficiency. Originality/value Many firm-specific and environmental factors drive the relation between competition and investment. Khanna and Tice (2000) find profitable firms increasing and highly levered firms decreasing investments in response to Wal-Mart’s entry into their markets. Jiang et al. (2015) suggest that environments with predictable growth drive a positive relation between competition and investments. This study claims that another factor that affects this relation is the firm’s level of FC.

The impact of product market competition on stock price crash risk

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1141-1153
Author(s):  
Jia Li ◽  
Zhengying Luo
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Crash Risk ◽  
Competitive Position ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Industry Competition ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of product market competition on the risk of stock price crash based on the degree of industry competition and the competitive position of enterprises. Design/methodology/approach This paper chooses the data of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2017 as samples and uses a threshold regression model to explore the impact of product market competition on the risk of a stock price crash. Findings The results show that: the overall level of industry competition is negatively correlated with the risk of stock price crash; the competitive position of enterprises and the risk of a stock price crash. The correlation is not significant: for high competitive enterprises, the degree of industry competition is negatively correlated with the risk of stock price crash; for low competitive enterprises, the degree of industry competition is positively correlated with the risk of a stock price crash and the conclusions obtained have passed the robustness test. Originality/value This paper not only enriches the literature on the relationship between product market competition and the risk of stock price crash but also has reference significance for supervisors to allocate resources to supervise information disclosure of listed companies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document