Boat-electrofishing transect location and flow levels: influence on riverine fish monitoring in non-wadeable habitats

2021 ◽  
Vol 193 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott M. Reid ◽  
Tim Haxton ◽  
Lee F. G. Gutowsky
2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 1905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonhard Egg ◽  
Joachim Pander ◽  
Melanie Mueller ◽  
Juergen Geist

Monitoring of fish movement is important in understanding and optimising the functionality of fishways and in restoring riverine connectivity. This study compared fish monitoring data (ARIS sonar-based and GoPro camera-based), with catches in a multi-mesh stow net following downstream passage in a small river in Bavaria, Germany. In terms of the number of individuals, the sonar-based system (detection rate=62.6% of net-based catches) outnumbered the counts of the camera-based system (45.4%). Smaller specimens of <100 and <150mm were under-represented with the sonar and the camera-based systems respectively. Species identification based on the camera system was similar to that for net-based catch, whereas no proper species identification could be performed with sonar data. In conclusion, the sonar-based system can be recommended for the counting of fish >100mm during night and turbid conditions, unless species identification is necessary. During daylight and with clear water, cameras can be a cheaper and promising option to monitor species compositions of fish >150mm.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Côte ◽  
Océane Morisseau ◽  
Camille Pilisi ◽  
Charlotte Veyssière ◽  
Annie Perrault ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Gehrke ◽  
John H. Harris

Riverine fish in New South Wales were studied to examine longitudinal trends in species richness and to identify fish communities on a large spatial scale. Five replicate rivers of four types (montane, slopes, regulated lowland and unregulated lowland) were selected from North Coast, South Coast, Murray and Darling regions. Fishwere sampled during summer and winter in two consecutive years with standardized gear that maximized the range of species caught. The composition of fish communities varied among regions and river types, with little temporal variation. Distinct regional communities converged in montane reaches and diverged downstream. The fish fauna can be classified into North Coast, South Coast, Murray and Darling communities, with a distinct montane community at high elevations irrespective of the drainage division. Species richness increased downstream in both North Coast and South Coast regions by both replacement and the addition of new species. In contrast, species richness in the Darling and Murray regions reached a maximum in the slopes reaches and then declined, reflecting a loss of species in lowland reaches. The small number of species is typical of the freshwater fish faunas of similar climatic regions world-wide. Fish communities identified in this study form logical entities for fisheries management consistent with the ecosystem-focused, catchment-based approach to river management and water reform being adopted in Australia.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. BAUMGARTNER ◽  
N. K. REYNOLDSON ◽  
L. CAMERON ◽  
J. G. STANGER
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
E. Gebhart ◽  
W. Rosler ◽  
M. Gramatzki ◽  
U. Trautmann
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gertrud Haidvogl ◽  
Dmitry Lajus ◽  
Didier Pont ◽  
Martin Schmid ◽  
Mathias Jungwirth ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
D. A. Crook ◽  
A. I. Robertson

This paper reviews studies of relationships between riverine fish and woody debris at micro- and meso-habitat scales, and discusses the potential functions of instream structure for lowland river fish. Experimental research, mainly in North America, has identified three main functions of woody debris as microhabitat for fish in upland streams: overhead cover that decreases predation risk both vertically and horizontally; horizontal visual isolation that reduces contact between fish; and velocity refuge which minimizes energetic costs. As with habitat features in other aquatic environments, increasing spatial complexity of woody debris may modify predator–prey interactions and provide greater surface areas for the growth of prey items. Woody debris may also provide spatial reference points for riverine fish to assist them in orienting within their surroundings. Lowland rivers differ from upland streams in terms of a number of physical variables, including turbidity, depth and water turbulence. Relationships between fish and woody debris in lowland rivers are likely to rely on mechanisms different to those in upland streams. Recent initiatives involving the reintroduction of woody debris into previously cleared lowland rivers to replace lost fish habitat are a positive development for lowland river restoration. However, if woody debris reintroduction is to maximally benefit lowland river fisheries, there is a requirement for better understanding of the ecological functions of woody debris in lowland rivers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document