Do Classroom Interactions Relate to Considerations of Institutional Departure Among Student Veterans and Service Members?

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-245
Author(s):  
Frank Fernandez ◽  
Dan Merson ◽  
Hyun Kyoung Ro ◽  
Susan Rankin
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Arminio ◽  
Tomoko Kudo Grabosky ◽  
Josh Lang

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenona H. Southwell ◽  
Shawn D. Whiteman ◽  
Shelley M. MacDermid Wadsworth ◽  
Adam E. Barry

Grounded in research and theory on college student retention, this study assessed differences in the use of various university services and the influence of key personnel on retention-related outcomes of student service members or veterans (SSM/Vs) compared with civilian students. Participants included 386 students, 199 (154 male, 45 female) of which were SSM/Vs and 187 (87 male, 100 female) were civilian students. Data were collected via electronic survey. Analyses revealed that civilian students visited advisors and faculty more frequently than SSM/Vs; no differences were evident for visits to registrars’ offices, financial aid offices, or student organizations. Visits to advisors and faculty were positively related to SSM/Vs’ expectations for degree completion and perception of university environment, yet unrelated to civilian students’ outcomes. Overall, this work suggests that university officials should invest in educating the personnel who are most influential in SSM/Vs outcomes about the unique needs of student veterans.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-254
Author(s):  
Jan Arminio ◽  
Aoi Yamanaka ◽  
Christina Hubbard ◽  
Janet Athanasiou ◽  
Meggan Ford ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christine Parrish ◽  
Carole Roth ◽  
Brooke Roberts ◽  
Gail Davie

Abstract Background: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is recognized as the signature injury of the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, yet there remains limited understanding of the persisting cognitive deficits of mTBI sustained in combat. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) have traditionally been responsible for evaluating and treating the cognitive-communication disorders following severe brain injuries. The evaluation instruments historically used are insensitive to the subtle deficits found in individuals with mTBI. Objectives: Based on the limited literature and clinical evidence describing traditional and current tests for measuring cognitive-communication deficits (CCD) of TBI, the strengths and weaknesses of the instruments are discussed relative to their use with mTBI. It is necessary to understand the nature and severity of CCD associated with mTBI for treatment planning and goal setting. Yet, the complexity of mTBI sustained in combat, which often co-occurs with PTSD and other psychological health and physiological issues, creates a clinical challenge for speech-language pathologists worldwide. The purpose of the paper is to explore methods for substantiating the nature and severity of CCD described by service members returning from combat. Methods: To better understand the nature of the functional cognitive-communication deficits described by service members returning from combat, a patient questionnaire and a test protocol were designed and administered to over 200 patients. Preliminary impressions are described addressing the nature of the deficits and the challenges faced in differentiating the etiologies of the CCD. Conclusions: Speech-language pathologists are challenged with evaluating, diagnosing, and treating the cognitive-communication deficits of mTBI resulting from combat-related injuries. Assessments that are sensitive to the functional deficits of mTBI are recommended. An interdisciplinary rehabilitation model is essential for differentially diagnosing the consequences of mTBI, PTSD, and other psychological and physical health concerns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document