scholarly journals Task Design Principles for Heuristic Refutation in Dynamic Geometry Environments

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kotaro Komatsu ◽  
Keith Jones
2013 ◽  
pp. 199-214
Author(s):  
Maha Abboud-Blanchard ◽  
Monique Chappet Paries

1994 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 716-717
Author(s):  
Celia Hoyles ◽  
Richard Noss

The September and October columns of this department described features of dynamic geometry environments. This month's column is concerned with the distinction between drawingand constructing in these environments, a theme that will be continued in later issues. Hoyles and Noss have devised a simple way, “messing up,” to make this distinction clearer for students.


2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-94
Author(s):  
S. Asli Özgün-Koca ◽  
Matt Enlow

In this month's Growing Problem Solvers, we focused on supporting students' understanding of congruence and similarity through rigid motions and transformations. Initial understandings of congruence and similarity begin in first grade as students work with shapes in different perspectives and orientations and reflect on similarities and differences.


2015 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Michael Todd Edwards ◽  
James Quinlan

Current standards place significant emphasis on transformations in school geometry: “Fundamental are the rigid motions: translations, rotations, reflections, and combinations of these,” and “dynamic geometry environments provide students with experimental and modeling tools that allow them to investigate geometric phenomena” (CCSSI, 2010, p. 74). With these aims in mind, we share a favorite classroom activity—virtual miniature golf. Building on the work of Coxford and Usiskin (1991) and Powell et al. (1994), this activity provides geometry students with a real-world context for exploring reflection and reflection composition in technology-rich settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document