scholarly journals Editor’s Note: Special Issue on High-level Programming for Heterogeneous Parallel Systems (2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-135
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 669-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Mudalige ◽  
M.B. Giles ◽  
J. Thiyagalingam ◽  
I.Z. Reguly ◽  
C. Bertolli ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 281-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Grasso ◽  
Klaus Kofler ◽  
Biagio Cosenza ◽  
Thomas Fahringer

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1961-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
XueJun Yang ◽  
Tao Tang ◽  
GuiBin Wang ◽  
Jia Jia ◽  
XinHai Xu

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-146
Author(s):  
Annamarie van der Merwe

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with a high-level overview of the key messages of each of the four King Reports on Corporate Governance for South Africa, published during the period from 1994 to 2017, with a particular focus on the stakeholder-inclusive approach. While confirming the constant themes and messages, it also highlights the unique features and attributes of each of these reports. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on a review and comparison of the four King Reports of Corporate Governance for South Africa with a particular focus on the stakeholder-inclusive approach. Findings The key findings of this paper are: the concept of “stakeholder inclusivity” is a common theme across all four the King Reports forming part of the review while, at the same time, having a unique flavour in each of the reports and visibly developing over the years. The reliance on human intervention and ethical leaders to appropriately and effectively steer the stakeholder-inclusive approach is obvious. In the absence of this, no corporate governance code will provide adequate safeguards to stakeholders against corporate failures and disasters, whether in South Africa or anywhere else. Originality/value This paper is a part of a special issue which looks at the contribution of the King Reports to governance globally.


2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELSA JOÃO ◽  
ANNA MCLAUCHLAN

Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) has often been identified as a key tool to contribute to sustainable development. This special issue of the Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management focuses on European SEA practice between 2003 and 2010 to critically evaluate SEA links to sustainable development and similar, difficult to define, high-level policy objectives: democratisation, good governance, agri-environmental objectives, and environmental justice. The papers centre upon the three main topics covered by the different research: SEA outcomes being directly related to policy goals; an analysis of the absence of SEA applied to "positive" policy objectives; and the realism of associating SEA with high-level policy objectives. In particular, this paper calls for greater critical engagement with this latter topic, identifying a need to examine why associations are made between SEA and policy goals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document