scholarly journals Special issue: Exploring global and transnational governance of climate change adaptation

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 357-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Åsa Persson ◽  
Adis Dzebo
2021 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 105786
Author(s):  
Martin Lehmann ◽  
David C. Major ◽  
James Fitton ◽  
Ken Doust ◽  
Sean O'Donoghue

Climate Law ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Wilson ◽  
Catrien Termeer

Climate ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
Kathy Lewis ◽  
Douglas Warner

As we lie firmly entrenched within what many have termed the Anthropocene, the time of humans, human influence on the functioning of the planet has never been greater or in greater need of mitigation [...]


Author(s):  
Dhruba Pant ◽  
Kamal Raj Gautam

The vulnerability of the communities to the climate change effect is expected to increase and concerted effort from all concerned at all levels has become important. Policy, plans and programs and their implementation are important in addressing the issues and effects of climate change. This paper looks into the policy, legal and institutional mechanisms and their effectiveness and weaknesses in addressing climate change adaptation through the review of the three major policies and strategies of the Nepal Government, which have bearing on the climate change issues.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hn.v11i1.7224 Hydro Nepal Special Issue: Conference Proceedings 2012 pp.100-105


2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Capela Lourenço ◽  
Ana Rovisco ◽  
Suraje Dessai ◽  
Richard Moss ◽  
Arthur Petersen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Pisor ◽  
James Holland Jones

OBJECTIVES. Despite our focus on adaptation and human responses to climate, evolutionary and biological anthropologists (EBAs) are largely absent from conversations about contemporary “climate-change adaptation,” a term popular in other disciplines, the development world, and related policy decisions. EBAs are missing a big opportunity to contribute to impactful, time-sensitive applied work: we have extensive theoretical and empirical knowledge pertinent to conversations about climate-change adaptation and to helping support communities as they cope. This special issue takes a tour of EBA contributions to our understanding of climate-change adaptation, from data on past and contemporary human communities to theoretically informed predictions about how individuals and communities will respond to climate change now and in the future. First, however, we must establish what we mean by “climate change” and “adaptation,” along with other terms commonly used by EBAs; review what EBAs know about adaptation and about human responses to climate change; and identify just a few topics EBAs study that are pertinent to ongoing conversations about climate-change adaptation. In this article, we do just that. CONCLUSION. From our work on energy use to our work on demography, subsistence, social networks, and the salience of climate change to local communities, EBAs have an abundance of data and theoretical insights to help inform responses to contemporary climate change. We need to better reach the climate community and general public with our contributions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-213
Author(s):  
Anna Davies ◽  
Gregory Hooks ◽  
Janelle Knox-Hayes ◽  
Raoul S Liévanos

Abstract Anthropogenic climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of the physical threats to human and planetary wellbeing. However, climate change risks, and their interaction with other “riskscapes”, remain understudied. Riskscapes encompass different viewpoints on the threat of loss across space, time, individuals and collectives. This Special Issue of the Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society enhances our understanding of the multifaceted and interlocking dimensions of climate change and riskscapes. It brings together rigorous and critical international scholarship across diverse realms on inquiry under two, interlinked, themes: (i) governance and institutional responses and (ii) vulnerabilities and inequalities. The contributors offer a forceful reminder that when considering climate change, social justice principles cannot be appended after the fact. Climate change adaptation and mitigation pose complex and interdependent social and ethical dilemmas that will need to be explicitly confronted in any activation of “Green New Deal” strategies currently being developed internationally. Such critical insights about the layered, unequal and institutional dimensions of risks are of paramount import when considering other riskscapes pertaining to conflict and war, displaced people and pandemics like the 2019–2020 global COVID-19 pandemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document