Climate mitigation policies and actions: access and allocation issues

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-301
Author(s):  
Antonina Ivanova ◽  
Asim Zia ◽  
Paiman Ahmad ◽  
Mairon Bastos-Lima
Keyword(s):  
Climate Mitigation ◽  
Climate Mitigation Policies ◽  
Mitigation Policies

Brazil deforestation pressures will mount at COP26

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
General Assembly ◽  
Climate Mitigation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
International Assistance ◽  
International Pressure ◽  
International Climate ◽  
Un General Assembly ◽  
Business Sectors ◽  
Climate Mitigation Policies ◽  
Mitigation Policies

Significance During last month’s UN General Assembly, President Jair Bolsonaro unsuccessfully argued that his government was controlling deforestation in the Amazon region. Reports indicate that between August 2020 and July 2021, nearly 8,800 square kilometres (km2) of forest were cut down. Impacts Despite stronger international pressure, the outlook for forest preservation is alarming absent a well-structured policy for Amazonia. Major Brazilian business sectors will face significant risks from international climate pushback without policy improvements. Brazil will argue for greater international assistance to offset the costs of climate mitigation policies.

scholarly journals Accounting for all territorial emissions and sinks is important for development of climate mitigation policies

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Lindroth ◽  
Lars Tranvik
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Paris Agreement ◽  
Climate Mitigation ◽  
Running Waters ◽  
Mitigation Policy ◽  
Sources And Sinks ◽  
Global Inventory ◽  
Rich Countries ◽  
Climate Mitigation Policies ◽  
Mitigation Policies

AbstractThe Paris agreement identifies the importance of the conservation, or better, increase of the land carbon sink. In this respect, the mitigation policies of many forest rich countries rely heavily on products from forests as well as on the land sink. Here we demonstrate that Sweden’s land sink, which is critical in order to achieve zero net emissions by 2045 and negative emissions thereafter, is reduced to less than half when accounting for emissions from wetlands, lakes and running waters. This should have implications for the development of Sweden’s mitigation policy. National as well as the emerging global inventory of sources and sinks need to consider the entire territory to allow accurate guidance of future mitigation of climate change.

Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Rafaj ◽  
Wolfgang Schöpp ◽  
Peter Russ ◽  
Chris Heyes ◽  
Markus Amann
Keyword(s):  
Global Climate ◽  
Climate Mitigation ◽  
Climate Mitigation Policies ◽  
Mitigation Policies
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document