Heart rate score and outcomes in ICD patients: insights from the prospective randomized INTRINSIC RV trial

Author(s):  
Rakesh Gopinathannair ◽  
Arjun Sharma ◽  
Paul Jones ◽  
Connor English ◽  
Stephen Furmanek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun D. Sharma ◽  
Mark Richards ◽  
Brian Olshansky ◽  
Nicholas Wold ◽  
Paul Jones ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-111
Author(s):  
Brian Olshansky ◽  
Mark Richards ◽  
Arjun D. Sharma ◽  
Paul W. Jones ◽  
Nick Wold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRUCE L. WILKOFF ◽  
MARK RICHARDS ◽  
ARJUN SHARMA ◽  
NICHOLAS WOLD ◽  
PAUL JONES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1730-1735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Richards ◽  
Brian Olshansky ◽  
Arjun D. Sharma ◽  
Nicholas Wold ◽  
Paul Jones ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. S152-S153
Author(s):  
Takeshi Shimizu ◽  
Akiomi Yoshihisa ◽  
Shoji Iwaya ◽  
Makiko Miyata ◽  
Satoshi Abe ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 2819-2824

Heart monitoring is needed in order to know the patient’s heart condition. In monitoring, storage media of heart monitor result is needed in order to help doctors and paramedics examine the patients. Therefore, a research to plan and create logger data system of heart signal as a modification of electrocardiograph was conducted. This research used amplifier, active High Pass Filter, active Low Pass Filter, Noch Filter, summing adder, and Microcontroller, and Delphi 7 Software to make interface program on personal computer. Heart Rate score (BPM) on 2x16 LCD indicated final error of 2,8%. Meanwhile, the final error of Software module was 1,4%. The measurement of lead II R signal amplitude resulted the final error of -4,5% and the final error on the distance length from R to R was -1,1%. Heart Rate score (BPM) with two human samples indicated error on sample one on sitting position of -3,8% and on sample two -6,3%, Sample one on Standing Position 2,9% and sample two -4,1%, Sample one on Roll Call -1,7% and sample one -8,4% and sample one on running in place -4,6% and sample two 4,1%. The result reading on Delphy 7 Software the errors were -0,3% on sample one and -6,5% on sample two. On standing position, sample one was -0,6% and sample two -2,2%, roll call position for sample one 1,7% and sample two -8,4%, and running in place for sample one 4,1% and sample two 3,3%. The score of R signal amplitude and the distance length from R of R on human sample indicated error for amplitude in sitting position -9,6%, standing -1,3%, roll call -3,0%, running in place -5,9%. The error on distance from R to R on sitting position was -5,9%, standing -17,3%, roll call 6,7%, and running in place 13,8%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document