Regionalized Health System Review of Automated Dispensing Cabinet Overrides

Emily Repella; Zachary Hagen; Stacy Carson; Fei Wang

doi:10.1007/s10916-021-01792-x

Regionalized Health System Review of Automated Dispensing Cabinet Overrides

Journal of Medical Systems ◽

10.1007/s10916-021-01792-x ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 46 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Emily Repella ◽

Zachary Hagen ◽

Stacy Carson ◽

Fei Wang

Keyword(s):

Health System ◽

System Review

Download Full-text

Generalist Medicine and the U.S. Health System (review)

Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved ◽

10.1353/hpu.2006.0132 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 17 (4) ◽

pp. 958-959

Author(s):

Telisha W. Miller ◽

Patricia Rodney

Keyword(s):

Health System ◽

System Review ◽

The U.S

Download Full-text

Design of a low power ECG signal processor for wearable health system-review and implementation issues

2017 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO) ◽

10.1109/isco.2017.7856022 ◽

2017 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

K. Raja ◽

S. Saravanan ◽

R. Anitha ◽

S. Suganthi Priya ◽

R. Subhashini

Keyword(s):

Low Power ◽

Health System ◽

Ecg Signal ◽

System Review ◽

Signal Processor

Download Full-text

Narrative review of European healthcare benchmarking experiences: shared goals, different focuses and formats (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.28642 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Anna García-Altés ◽

Cristina Adroher ◽

Viky Morón ◽

Boi Ruiz

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Health System ◽

Patient Experience ◽

Healthcare Quality ◽

European Countries ◽

Data Sources ◽

Web Based ◽

European Healthcare ◽

System Review ◽

Conflicting Goals

BACKGROUND Benchmarking experiences have been flourishing in Europe during the last years with the idea of improving healthcare quality. OBJECTIVE This paper aims to review the European benchmarking experiences, analysing their main characteristics and highlighting common and differential ones. METHODS The identification of benchmarking experiences was based on the list of European countries for which there exists an electronic “HiT health system review”. Predefined variables were identified, mainly data sources, formats, topics, and target audiences. RESULTS 14 benchmarking experiences were identified. Most of them are governmental. All of them are web-based. The easiness to navigate through the websites and materials and to understand them varies among experiences. Most common data sources are registries. Few experiences include patient experience indicators. None of them explicitly mentions if they use results as the basis to start quality improvement efforts. CONCLUSIONS Benchmarking is essential for transparency and accountability, and to support improvement. To do this effectively it must reconcile important and potentially conflicting goals: meaningful accountability, requiring real consequences from underperformance, and an environment that encourages open and honest reporting. Enhancing reporting websites is needed.

Download Full-text