scholarly journals Exercise to Support Indigenous Pregnant Women to Stop Smoking: Acceptability to Māori

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2040-2051
Author(s):  
Vaughan Roberts ◽  
Marewa Glover ◽  
Lesley McCowan ◽  
Natalie Walker ◽  
Michael Ussher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-205
Author(s):  
Gillian Sandra Gould ◽  
Simon Chiu ◽  
Christopher Oldmeadow ◽  
Yael Bar-Zeev ◽  
Michelle Bovill ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroductionDuring pregnancy, the imperative to stop smoking becomes urgent due to health risks for mother and baby.AimExplore responses to a smoking-related, pregnancy-focused Risk Behaviour Diagnosis (RBD) Scale over time with Aboriginal1 pregnant women.MethodsSix Aboriginal Medical Services in three states recruited 22 eligible women: ⩽28 weeks' gestation, ⩾16 years old, smoked tobacco, pregnant with an Aboriginal baby. Surveys were completed at baseline (n = 22), 4-weeks (n = 16) and 12-weeks (n = 17). RBD Scale outcome measures included: perceived threat (susceptibility and severity), perceived efficacy (response and self-efficacy), fear control (avoidance), danger control (intentions to quit) and protection responses (protecting babies).ResultsAt baseline, the total mean threat scores at 4.2 (95% CI: 3.9–4.4) were higher than total mean efficacy scores at 3.9 (95% CI: 3.6–4.1). Over time there was a non-significant reduction in total mean threat and efficacy; fear control increased; danger control and protection responses remained stable. Reduction of threat and efficacy perceptions, with raised fear control responses, may indicate a blunting effect (a coping style which involves avoidance of risks).ConclusionIn 22 Aboriginal pregnant women, risk perception changed over time. A larger study is warranted to understand how Aboriginal women perceive smoking risks as the pregnancy progresses so that health messages are delivered accordingly.


2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 575-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Aveyard ◽  
Terry Lawrence ◽  
Emma Croghan ◽  
Olga Evans ◽  
K.K. Cheng

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Jones ◽  
Sharon Hamilton ◽  
Ruth Bell ◽  
Vera Araújo-Soares ◽  
Martin White

Abstract Background Smoking during pregnancy has serious consequences for maternal and child health. An intervention package to embed National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance (babyClear©) was delivered across maternity and stop smoking services (SSS) within an English region, to support pregnant women to stop smoking. We aimed to ascertain acceptability among pregnant smokers receiving the intervention. Methods Pregnant smokers who received the intervention and participated in the study were interviewed, first at around 16 weeks of pregnancy (n = 17) and again several weeks later (n = 8) or postpartum (n = 3). Interview schedules were informed by Normalization Process Theory (NPT) and Theoretical Domains Framework; interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically, using the Framework method and NPT. Findings are grouped according to the four NPT concepts. Results Coherence: Carbon monoxide monitoring appeared to make sense; women were motivated to quit by being monitored. Cognitive participation: When linked to a professional discourse of caring and concern, some women were prompted to engage with the SS message. Women were more guarded in their reaction to initial contact from the SSS; reporting attending appointments successfully, or in some cases, experiencing problems that decreased engagement and made quitting harder. Collective action: Where women continued to smoke or failed to attend SSS appointments, an extra intervention was delivered, the Risk Perception Tool (RPT), which often prompted pregnant women to act. Reflexive monitoring: Most women accepted the need for a hard-hitting approach (RPT) and, while it distressed them at the time, they claimed they were subsequently grateful for it. SSS intervention post-RPT was seen as supportive, partly because it often involved home visits. Aspects of family inclusion in babyClear© were reported as beneficial. In Trusts where women experienced services as less focused on prioritising the stop smoking message, less well integrated or reported maternity staff as less adept at delivering the RPT, women found babyClear© less acceptable overall. Conclusions The babyClear© package was acceptable to pregnant smokers interviewed during and shortly after pregnancy and, in some cases, to promote quitting. However, some contexts were more optimal than others, leading to variation in acceptability overall.


2021 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 106777
Author(s):  
Marlon P. Mundt ◽  
Michael C. Fiore ◽  
Megan E. Piper ◽  
Robert T. Adsit ◽  
Kathleen H. Kobinsky ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Allison Ford ◽  
Isabelle Uny ◽  
Judith Lowes ◽  
Felix Naughton ◽  
Sue Cooper ◽  
...  

Use of e-cigarettes (vaping) has potential to help pregnant women stop smoking. This study explored factors influencing adherence among participants in the vaping arm of the first trial of vaping for smoking cessation in pregnancy. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 28) with women at three-months postpartum. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis, informed by the Theoretical-Domains Framework, Necessity-Concerns Framework and Perceptions and Practicalities Approach. Interviewees generally reported high levels of vaping. We found that: (1) intervention adherence was driven by four necessity beliefs—stopping smoking for the baby, and vaping for harm reduction, smoking cessation or as a last resort; (2) necessity beliefs outweighed vaping concerns, such as dependence and safety; (3) adherence was linked to four practicalities themes, acting as barriers and facilitators to vaping—device and e-liquid perceptions, resources and support, whether vaping became habitual, and social and environmental factors; and (4) intentional non-adherence was rare; unintentional non-adherence was due to device failures, forgetting to vape, and personal circumstances and stress. Pregnant smokers provided with e-cigarettes, and with generally high levels of vaping, had positive beliefs about the necessity of vaping for smoking cessation which outweighed concerns about vaping. Non-adherence was mainly due to unintentional factors.


Midwifery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. e1-e13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes McGowan ◽  
Shirley Hamilton ◽  
Deborah Barnett ◽  
Margaret Nsofor ◽  
Judith Proudfoot ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Tellioglu ◽  
P Fikar ◽  
R Ganhör ◽  
M Habiger ◽  
M Urbanek
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document