Few-shot learning for skin lesion image classification

Author(s):  
Xue-Jun Liu ◽  
Kai-li Li ◽  
Hai-ying Luan ◽  
Wen-hui Wang ◽  
Zhao-yu Chen
2020 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 105725
Author(s):  
Amirreza Mahbod ◽  
Philipp Tschandl ◽  
Georg Langs ◽  
Rupert Ecker ◽  
Isabella Ellinger

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman C Maron ◽  
Achim Hekler ◽  
Eva Krieghoff-Henning ◽  
Max Schmitt ◽  
Justin G Schlager ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Studies have shown that artificial intelligence achieves similar or better performance than dermatologists in specific dermoscopic image classification tasks. However, artificial intelligence is susceptible to the influence of confounding factors within images (eg, skin markings), which can lead to false diagnoses of cancerous skin lesions. Image segmentation can remove lesion-adjacent confounding factors but greatly change the image representation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 2 image classification workflows where images were either segmented or left unprocessed before the subsequent training and evaluation of a binary skin lesion classifier. METHODS Separate binary skin lesion classifiers (nevus vs melanoma) were trained and evaluated on segmented and unsegmented dermoscopic images. For a more informative result, separate classifiers were trained on 2 distinct training data sets (human against machine [HAM] and International Skin Imaging Collaboration [ISIC]). Each training run was repeated 5 times. The mean performance of the 5 runs was evaluated on a multi-source test set (n=688) consisting of a holdout and an external component. RESULTS Our findings showed that when trained on HAM, the segmented classifiers showed a higher overall balanced accuracy (75.6% [SD 1.1%]) than the unsegmented classifiers (66.7% [SD 3.2%]), which was significant in 4 out of 5 runs (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). The overall balanced accuracy was numerically higher for the unsegmented ISIC classifiers (78.3% [SD 1.8%]) than for the segmented ISIC classifiers (77.4% [SD 1.5%]), which was significantly different in 1 out of 5 runs (<i>P</i>=.004). CONCLUSIONS Image segmentation does not result in overall performance decrease but it causes the beneficial removal of lesion-adjacent confounding factors. Thus, it is a viable option to address the negative impact that confounding factors have on deep learning models in dermatology. However, the segmentation step might introduce new pitfalls, which require further investigations.


Author(s):  
Long H. Ngo ◽  
Marie Luong ◽  
Nikolay M. Sirakov ◽  
Emmanuel Viennet ◽  
Thuong Le-Tien

10.2196/21695 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. e21695
Author(s):  
Roman C Maron ◽  
Achim Hekler ◽  
Eva Krieghoff-Henning ◽  
Max Schmitt ◽  
Justin G Schlager ◽  
...  

Background Studies have shown that artificial intelligence achieves similar or better performance than dermatologists in specific dermoscopic image classification tasks. However, artificial intelligence is susceptible to the influence of confounding factors within images (eg, skin markings), which can lead to false diagnoses of cancerous skin lesions. Image segmentation can remove lesion-adjacent confounding factors but greatly change the image representation. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 2 image classification workflows where images were either segmented or left unprocessed before the subsequent training and evaluation of a binary skin lesion classifier. Methods Separate binary skin lesion classifiers (nevus vs melanoma) were trained and evaluated on segmented and unsegmented dermoscopic images. For a more informative result, separate classifiers were trained on 2 distinct training data sets (human against machine [HAM] and International Skin Imaging Collaboration [ISIC]). Each training run was repeated 5 times. The mean performance of the 5 runs was evaluated on a multi-source test set (n=688) consisting of a holdout and an external component. Results Our findings showed that when trained on HAM, the segmented classifiers showed a higher overall balanced accuracy (75.6% [SD 1.1%]) than the unsegmented classifiers (66.7% [SD 3.2%]), which was significant in 4 out of 5 runs (P<.001). The overall balanced accuracy was numerically higher for the unsegmented ISIC classifiers (78.3% [SD 1.8%]) than for the segmented ISIC classifiers (77.4% [SD 1.5%]), which was significantly different in 1 out of 5 runs (P=.004). Conclusions Image segmentation does not result in overall performance decrease but it causes the beneficial removal of lesion-adjacent confounding factors. Thus, it is a viable option to address the negative impact that confounding factors have on deep learning models in dermatology. However, the segmentation step might introduce new pitfalls, which require further investigations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. 225-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Csaba Halmy ◽  
Zoltán Nádai ◽  
Krisztián Csőre ◽  
Adrienne Vajda ◽  
Róbert Tamás

Authors report on the use of Integra dermal regeneration template after excision of an extended, recurrent skin tumor in the temporal region. The area covered with Integra was 180 cm2. Skin grafting to cover Integra was performed on the 28th day. Both Integra and the skin transplant were taken 100%. Integra dermal regeneration template can provide good functional and aesthetic result in the surgical management of extended skin tumors over the skull. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 225–227.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document