The Role of Natural Selection in the Origin of Life

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris Fry
Author(s):  
John Maynard Smith ◽  
Eors Szathmary

Imagine that, when the first spacemen step out of their craft onto the surface of one of the moons of Jupiter, they are confronted by an object the size of a horse, rolling towards them on wheels, and bearing on its back a concave disc pointing towards the Sun. They will at once conclude that the object is alive, or has been made by something alive. If all they find is a purple smear on the surface of the rocks, they will have to work harder to decide. This is the phenotypic approach to the definition of life: a thing is alive if it has parts, or ‘organs’, which perform functions. William Paley explained the machine-like nature of life by the existence of a creator: today, we would invoke natural selection. There are, however, dangers in assuming that any entity with the properties of a self-regulating machine is alive, or an artefact. In section 2.2, we tell the story of a self-regulating atomic reactor, the Oklo reactor, which is neither. This story can be taken in one of three ways. First, it shows the dangers of the phenotypic definition of life: not all complex entities are alive. Second, it illustrates how the accidents of history can give rise spontaneously to surprisingly complex machine-like entities. The relevance of this to the origin of life is obvious. In essence, the problem is the following. How could chemical and physical processes give rise, without natural selection, to entities capable of hereditary replication, which would therefore, from then on, evolve by natural selection? The Oklo reactor is an example of what can happen. Finally, section 2.2 can simply be skipped: the events were interesting, but do not resemble in detail those that led to the origin of life on Earth. There is an alternative to the phenotypic definition of life. It is to define as alive any entities that have the properties of multiplication, variation and heredity. The logic behind this definition, first proposed by Muller (1966), is that a population of entities with these properties will evolve by natural selection, and hence can be expected to acquire the complex adaptations for survival and reproduction that are characteristic of living things.


2021 ◽  
pp. 82-96
Author(s):  
Franklin M. Harold

The origin of life is the most consequential problem in biology, possibly in all of science, and it remains unsolved. This chapter summarizes what has been learned and highlights questions that remain open, including How, Where, When, and especially Why. LUCA, some four billion years ago, already featured the basic capacities of contemporary cells. These must have evolved still earlier, at a nebulous proto-cellular stage. There is good reason to believe that enzymes, DNA, ribosomes, electron-transport chains, and the rotary ATP synthase all predate LUCA and were shaped by the standard process of variation and natural selection, but we know next to nothing about how cells ever got started. I favor the proposal that it began with a purely chemical dynamic network capable of reproducing itself, that may have originated by chance. Natural selection would have favored the incorporation of any ancillary factors that promoted its kinetic stability, especially ones that improved reproduction or gave access to energy. All the specifics are in dispute, including the role of a prebiotic broth of organic chemicals, the nature and origin of enclosure, the RNA world, and a venue in submarine hydrothermal vents. My sense is that critical pieces of the puzzle remain to be discovered.


Astrobiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1121-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Osinski ◽  
C.S. Cockell ◽  
A. Pontefract ◽  
H.M. Sapers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
soumya banerjee ◽  
joyeeta ghose

Information plays a critical role in complex biological systems. Complex systems like immune systems andant colonies co-ordinate heterogeneous components in a decentralized fashion. How do these distributeddecentralized systems function? One key component is how these complex systems efficiently processinformation. These complex systems have an architecture for integrating and processing information comingin from various sources and points to the value of information in the functioning of different complexbiological systems. This paper is a teaching resource that explains the role of information processing inquestions around the origin of life and suggests how computational simulations may yield insights intoquestions related to the origin of life.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
soumya banerjee

Information plays a critical role in complex biologicalsystems. This article proposes a role for information processing in questions around the origin of life and suggests how computational simulations may yield insights into questions related to the origin of life. Such a computational model of the origin of life would unify thermodynamics with information processing and we would gain an appreciation of why proteins and nucleotides evolved as the substrate of computation andinformation processing in living systems that we see on Earth. Answers to questions like these may give us insights into noncarbon based forms of life that we could search for outside Earth. I hypothesize that carbon-based life forms are only one amongst a continuum of life-like systems in the universe.Investigations into the role of computational substrates that allow information processing is important and could yield insights into:1) novel non-carbon based computational substrates thatmay have “life-like” properties, and2) how life may have actually originated from non-life onEarth. Life may exist as a continuum between non-life and life and we may have to revise our notion of life and how common it is in the universe.Looking at life or life-like phenomena through the lens ofinformation theory may yield a broader view of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document