Dry Reforming of Methane with Carbon Dioxide Using Pulsed DC Arc Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. H. Yan ◽  
Q. Wang ◽  
Y. Jin ◽  
Y. Cheng
2020 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 101352
Author(s):  
Duy Khoe Dinh ◽  
Georgi Trenchev ◽  
Dae Hoon Lee ◽  
Annemie Bogaerts

RSC Advances ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (74) ◽  
pp. 70537-70546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaopeng Yu ◽  
Fubao Zhang ◽  
Wei Chu

NiCo and NiCu catalysts exhibited enhanced stability compared with a Ni catalyst for the dry reforming of methane. On the contrary, NiMn and NiZr catalysts decreased the reforming stability.


2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1071-1095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragan Rankovic ◽  
Miroslav Kuzmanovic ◽  
Mirjana S. Pavlovic ◽  
Milovan Stoiljkovic ◽  
Jelena Savovic

2022 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 101869
Author(s):  
Bart Wanten ◽  
Stein Maerivoet ◽  
Christine Vantomme ◽  
Joachim Slaets ◽  
Georgi Trenchev ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Saeid Abbasi ◽  
Mohsen Abbasi ◽  
Firouz Tabkhi ◽  
Benyamin Akhlaghi

Applicability of using Dry Reforming of Methane (DRM) using low-cost Ni-based catalysts instead of Conventional Steam Reformers (CSR) to producing syngas simultaneously with reducing the emission of carbon dioxide was studied. In order to achieving this goal, a multi-tubular recuperative thermally coupled reactor which consists of two-concentric-tubes has been designed (Thermally Coupled Tri- and Dry Reformer [TCTDR]). By employing parameters of an industrial scale CSR, two proposed configuration (DRM with fired-furnace and Tri-Reforming of Methane (TRM) instead of fired-furnace (TCTDR)) was simulated. A mathematical heterogeneous model was used to simulate proposed reactors and analyses were carried out based on methane conversion, hydrogen yield and molar flow rate of syngas for each reactor. The results displayed methane conversion of DRM with fired-furnace was 35.29% and 31.44% for Ni–K/CeO2–Al2O3 and Ni/La2O3 catalysts, respectively, in comparison to 26.5% in CSR. Methane conversion in TCTDR reached to 16.98% by Ni/La2O3 catalyst and 88.05% by NiO–Mg/Ce–ZrO2/Al2O3 catalyst in TRM side. Also, it was 15.88% using Ni–K/CeO2–Al2O3 catalyst in the DRM side and 88.36% using NiO–Mg/Ce–ZrO2/Al2O3 catalyst in TRM side of TCTDR. Finally, the effect of different amounts of supplying energy on the performance of DRM with fired-furnace was studied, and positive results in reducing the energy consumption were observed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document