scholarly journals Venlafaxine Versus Applied Relaxation for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Study on Clinical and Electrophysiological Outcomes

2014 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Zullino ◽  
Anne Chatton ◽  
Emmanuelle Fresard ◽  
Miroslava Stankovic ◽  
Guido Bondolfi ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. jep.007910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Wells

The metacognitive model of pathological worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) makes a crucial distinction between two types of worry and explains the persistence and uncontrollability of negative thinking as an effect of specific metacognitions. The negative appraisal of worry (meta-worry) and negative beliefs about worry are central to the development of GAD. Furthermore, GAD is associated with paradoxes in mental control such as the use of extended thinking to reduce thinking. Evidence is reviewed that supports major tenets of the model. A specific treatment, metacognitive therapy is described that focuses on modifying metacognitive beliefs and reducing the use of worry to cope with thoughts. The empirical status of the model is reviewed and evidence from recent trials of this treatment is summarized. The treatment appears to be effective and initial trials suggest it is associated with greater levels of recovery than approaches comprised of applied relaxation or cognitive-behavioural treatment focused on intolerance of uncertainty.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Saramago ◽  
Lina Gega ◽  
David Marshall ◽  
Georgios F. Nikolaidis ◽  
Dina Jankovic ◽  
...  

Background: Generalized anxiety disorder is the most common mental health condition based on weekly prevalence. Digital interventions have been used as alternatives or as supplements to conventional therapies to improve access, patient choice, and clinical outcomes. Little is known about their comparative effectiveness for generalized anxiety disorder.Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing digital interventions with medication, non-digital interventions, non-therapeutic controls, and no intervention.Results: We included 21 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2,350 participants from generalized anxiety disorder populations. Pooled outcomes using analysis of Covariance and rankograms based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves indicated that antidepressant medication and group therapy had a higher probability than digital interventions of being the “best” intervention. Supported digital interventions were not necessarily “better” than unsupported (pure self-help) ones.Conclusions: Due to very wide confidence intervals, network meta-analysis results were inconclusive as to whether digital interventions are better than no intervention and non-therapeutic active controls, or whether they confer an additional benefit to standard therapy. Future research needs to compare digital interventions with one-to-one therapy and with manualized non-digital self-help and to include antidepressant medication as a treatment comparator and effect modifier.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey Robert Strawn ◽  
Jeffrey A. Mills ◽  
Heidi K. Schroeder ◽  
Sarah Mossman ◽  
Sara T. Varney ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document