Information Asymmetry and REIT Capital Market Access

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Devos ◽  
Erik Devos ◽  
Seow Eng Ong ◽  
Andrew C. Spieler
Author(s):  
Nils-Christian Bobenhausen ◽  
Astrid Juliane Salzmann

AbstractEquity rights offerings and their respective announcement effects have been studied extensively in the literature. Our study expands upon these studies and focuses on those announcement effects and the relation between the discount of an equity rights offering and the announcement effect. Previous theoretical and empirical analyses show that firms can signal their quality via the discount in an equity rights offering and demonstrate a negative relation between the discount and the announcement effect. We argue that this link is only relevant in environments where signalling is possible and necessary. These are financial markets with a particularly low level of capital market transparency, i.e. high information asymmetry. We calculate announcement effects for an international sample of equity rights offerings and show that the negative effect of the discount on announcement effects can only be observed in environments with a low capital market transparency. Hence, our study estimates announcement effects across several different countries and is thus among the first to analyse signalling considerations for equity rights offerings in different transparency environments.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
VIDHAN K. GOYAL ◽  
ALESSANDRO NOVA ◽  
LAURA ZANETTI

2015 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 36-45
Author(s):  
Jing WAN

The Stock Connect scheme launched on 17 November 2014 was the first mutual market access between mainland China and Hong Kong stock markets. It is the biggest move ever in the opening up of the capital market. Experiences accumulated will be of great value to mainland regulators who will decide on how these experiences could be utilised for China’s future opening up of its capital markets and for accelerating renminbi internationalisation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishak Ramli ◽  
Sukrisno Agoes ◽  
Ignatius Roni Setyawan

The purpose of this study is to prove that there was herding behavior by domestic investors following that of foreign investors in the Indonesian Capital Market (IDX) and that the herding was influenced by information asymmetry. It began when global investors undertook international diversification to the IDX because the returns on their portfolios were not on the efficient frontier during the crisis and because of the low correlation between Indonesia’s economy and the American and European economies. Utilizing the IDX daily transaction data during the years 2009-2011, the herding behavior of domestic investors, which followed that of foreign investors, was tested by Lakonishok models as was the influence of information asymmetry on the herding. It was found that the herding behavior in the IDX occurred in buy, sell or entire herdings (buy and sell). There were 0.40 to 0.55 buy herdings and 0.20 to 0.40 sell herdings during the crisis in 2008 and 2009. Buy herding then continued in 2010 onwards, although with lower intensity (0.05 to 0.20); however, sell herding decreased dramatically, and there has been almost no sell herding since then. Nevertheless, domestic investors did then sell in the opposite strategy, which was to sell when foreign investors tended to buy. Subsequent findings demonstrated that herding occurred with the influence of information asymmetry between domestic and foreign investors.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Campos-Espinoza ◽  
Hanns de la Fuente-Mella ◽  
Berta Silva-Palavecinos ◽  
David Cademartori-Rosso

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-71
Author(s):  
Niamh Moloney

This article considers the recent evolution of the EU’s third country regime for capital market access in light of Brexit, the important series of legislative reforms adopted in March 2019 as the 2014-2019 European Parliament/Commission term closed, and the emergence of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) as a material technocratic influence. The article suggests that while the capital market third country regime is changing (with Brexit a key but not exclusive driver of change), it is not being radically recast, although it is tightening. The regime remains broadly based on the more-or-less liberal ‘deference’ model which has long characterised EU third-country financial services policy. But it is becoming increasingly ‘on-shored’ by means of the direct application of EU rules and by ESMA’s oversight/supervision of certain third country actors. The significantly more restrictive approach being taken to third country central clearing counterparties is a marked development, but here the political and economic context is distinct. The implications of the overall shift towards a more ‘on-shore’, centralised, and potentially restrictive access regime are considered, and a modest reform prescription is offered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document