Reason and Faith: Themes from Richard Swinburne

2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-197
Author(s):  
Isaac Choi
2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (276) ◽  
pp. 647-650
Author(s):  
Raphael Lataster

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-195
Author(s):  
L. L. Volkova ◽  
◽  
V. V. Zhdanov ◽  
P. S. Zhorova ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Andrew Steane

The chapter discusses the subject of values and moral judgement. This begins with what is meant by values, and whether or not they can be objective and absolute. The main business of the chapter is to present a philosophical argument about the nature of this area. The argument shows that the existence of a standard which can properly command the allegiance of all free agents can be neither proved nor disproved using the tools of reason and logic. It is argued that the absence of such a standard would tend towards isolation of individuals from one another. Finally, it is pointed out that what people are most drawn to and value highest is not well captured in terms of purely impersonal abstractions. This is a pointer towards the journey beyond atheism. The interplay of reason and faith is then discussed.


1976 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 618-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Fitzgerald
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-166
Author(s):  
William N. Christensen ◽  
John King-Farlow
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
CALUM MILLER

AbstractOne reason for thinking that theism is a relatively simple theory – and that it is thereby more likely to be true than other theories,ceteris paribus – is to insist that infinite degrees of properties are simpler than extremely large, finite degrees of properties. This defence of theism has been championed by Richard Swinburne in recent years. I outline the objections to this line of argument present in the literature, and suggest some novel resources open to Swinburne in defence. I then argue that scientists' preference for universal nomological propositions constitutes a very strong reason for supposing that theism is simpler than parodical alternatives in virtue of its positing omni-properties rather than parallel ‘mega-properties’.


Mind ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (493) ◽  
pp. 387-390
Author(s):  
B. Berofsky
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 167-191
Author(s):  
Eleonore Stump

Recent work on the subject of faith has tended to focus on the epistemology of religious belief, considering such issues as whether beliefs held in faith are rational and how they may be justified. Richard Swinburne, for example, has developed an intricate explanation of the relationship between the propositions of faith and the evidence for them. Alvin Plantinga, on the other hand, has maintained that belief in God may be properly basic, that is, that a belief that God exists can be part of the foundation of a rational noetic structure. This sort of work has been useful in drawing attention to significant issues in the epistemology of religion, but these approaches to faith seem to me also to deepen some long-standing perplexities about traditional Christian views of faith.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document