scholarly journals Organizational Structure and Performance in Dutch small Firms

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joris Meijaard ◽  
Maryse J. Brand ◽  
Marco Mosselman
Author(s):  
Paul K. Edwards ◽  
Chin-Ju Tsai ◽  
Sukanya Sen Gupta ◽  
Monder Ram
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 535-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Birley ◽  
Paul Westhead
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliza Ching-Yick Tse ◽  
Michael D. Olsen

There is an increased emphasis in the management literature on the use of strategic management as the primary means of adapting organizations to their changing environments. for firms in the maturing hospitality industry to survive and succeed, they will have to depend upon their ability to strategically align themselves with the turbulent environment and select appropriate strategies to create defendable competitive positions. Success in strategy implementation depends partly on a proper match between strategy and organizational structure and this match is expected to have a positive impact on financial performance. This study was conducted to explore the relationships among strategies of restaurant firms, their organizational structure and financial performance. The top management team in 296 American multi-unit restaurant firms were surveyed. Results regarding relationships posited among strategy, structure and performance are presented.


Author(s):  
Olivia F. Lee ◽  
Can Uslay ◽  
Matthew L. Meuter

This chapter explores the firm-level technology orientation construct and highlights the importance of a small firm’s dynamic capabilities in knowledge learning and management. Technology orientation (TECHOR) is comprised of three sets of technology-oriented activities: the allocation of technology resources, the development of technology competence, and the ability to sense and respond to technology opportunities that influence technology adoption and utilization. As firms engage in more of these activities, they will have higher levels of technology orientation. Antecedents to TECHOR include external forces (technology policy and industry characteristics) and internal dynamics (role of management, interdepartmental connections, and organizational factors). Consequences include customer outcomes (technology learning, perceived quality, and loyalty), employee outcomes (technology learning, job satisfaction, and performance) and organizational outcomes (firm performance and competitive advantage). Small firms that can deliver the appropriate match between the required technology-oriented activities, technology adoption, and utilization are the ones that are likely to survive and thrive.


2001 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip D. Olson> ◽  
Newell Gough

Sample results indicate that significant relationships exist between export planning values and practices, and between the planning practice of using advisors and export performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document