The scholarly communication of economic knowledge: a citation analysis of Google Scholar

2016 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 1965-1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutao Sun ◽  
Belle Selene Xia
Keyword(s):  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Economic Knowledge

Citation Analysis ( Article ) Statistical Analysis of Stern Volmer equation Equation Applied on Biomolecules

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAYDIP DATTA
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Google Scholar

CITATION : Citation Analysis ( Article ) Statistical Analysis of Stern Volmer equation Equation Applied on Biomolecules. ( Academia.edu , Google Scholar )

Adjusting to the unexpected

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-438
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Jain ◽  
Sherry Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Management History

Purpose – This study aims to provide a literature review of the 56 articles published in the Journal of Management History (JMH) from 2000 to 2004. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted a thematic analysis using the categories of person, topic or event to classify articles as well as a citation analysis using Google Scholar. Findings – The number of articles published from 2000 to 2004 was almost 50 per cent fewer than published in the previous five years, and citation rates were lower. Originality/value – Results suggest that high-quality articles focused on persons or topics are more likely to be published in the JMH.

scholarly journals A Citation Analysis of College & Research Libraries Comparing Yahoo, Google, Google Scholar, and ISI Web of Knowledge with Implications for Promotion and Tenure

2009 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 460-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Martell
Keyword(s):  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Web Of Knowledge ◽  
Tenure Process

Two hundred and seventeen articles in College & Research Libraries from 2000 to 2006 were searched by title on Yahoo, Google, Google Scholar, and ISI Web of Knowledge to determine the frequency with which articles in the journal are cited, the effectiveness of the four search services, and the relevance and applicability of findings to promotion and tenure. Yahoo, Google, and ISI Web of Knowledge averaged between 2.8 and 3.5 citations per title for the period covered and Google Scholar averaged 6.4. The value of citations counts in the promotion and tenure process and the importance of publications in the evaluation of librarians are discussed.

scholarly journals Self-Citation Analysis on Google Scholar Dataset for H-Index Corrections

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 126025-126036
Author(s):  
Fiaz Majeed ◽  
Muhammad Shafiq ◽  
Amjad Ali ◽  
Muhammad Awais Hassan ◽  
Syed Ali Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
H Index

Mapping of Research in Agricultural Scientist’s Citation Analysis in Google Scholar, Scopus and Publons

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-30
Author(s):  
M. Sankar
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
End User ◽  
H Index ◽  
Innovative Idea ◽  
User Groups ◽  
Number Of Citations

An innovative idea developed by the researchers should reach the end user groups. The output of any researcher can be judged in terms of patents or his publications in the respective fields. Quality and impact of research work can be based on the citation and h index. Nowadays, there are several parameters considered for evaluating the performance of the research. Citation and h index are the quality parameters used for rating the originality and use of research. They are more useful for accessing the potentials of research as well as for providing a platform for collaborative projects at national / International levels. This paper presents the comparative analysis of citation and h index for identified researcher through three popular databases viz., Google Scholar, Scopus, and Publons. Among the three databases, Google Scholar showed a higher number of citations of the selected author due to data collected from unauthenticated documents as well as well established research databases.

scholarly journals Publishing and perishing? Publishing patterns of information science academics in Kenya

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Kwanya
Keyword(s):  
Communication Skills ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Research Collaboration ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Communication Channels ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Scholarly Work ◽  
Publish Or Perish ◽  
Bibliometric Approach

This study investigated the publishing patterns of information science academics in Kenya. Using a bibliometric approach, the author conducted an analysis of the quantity, quality and visibility of the publications indexed by Google Scholar. Data for the analysis was collected using Harzing’s “Publish or Perish” software from Google Scholar and presented using VOSviewer software. The findings of the study revealed low quantity, quality and visibility of research publications by information science academics in Kenya. Twenty (22.4%) serving academics are yet to publish any scholarly work. Similarly, 185 (42%) of the published papers have not been cited. This low publishing performance can be attributed to lack of scholarly communication skills; inadequate research funding and facilitation; limited access to scholarly communication channels; and heavy teaching workloads, among other factors. The quantity, quality and visibility of publications by information science academics in Kenya can be enhanced by training the lecturers on scholarly communication; accrediting journals and publishers; increasing research funding; strengthening research collaboration; increasing scholarly forums and platforms; and balancing lecturers’ teaching and research workloads.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document