A comprehensive quality model for service-oriented systems

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan J. Jureta ◽  
Caroline Herssens ◽  
Stéphane Faulkner
F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1140
Author(s):  
Peter Lachman ◽  
Paul Batalden ◽  
Kris Vanhaecht

Background: It is twenty years since the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) defined quality in healthcare, as comprising six domains: person-centredness, timeliness, efficiency, effectiveness, safety and equity. Since then, a new quality movement has emerged, with the development of numerous interventions aimed at improving quality, with a focus on accessibility, safety and effectiveness of care. Further gains in equity and timeliness have proven even more challenging. The challenge: With the emergence of “service-oriented” systems, complexity science, the challenges of climate change, the growth of social media and the internet and the new reality of COVID-19, the original domains proposed by the IOM invite reflection on their relevance and possibility for improvement. The possible solution: In this paper we propose a revised model of quality that is built on never-ending learning and includes new domains, such as Ecology and Transparency, which reflect the changing worldview of healthcare. We also introduce the concept of person- or “kin-centred care” to emphasise the shared humanity of people involved in the interdependent work. This is a more expansive view of what “person-centredness” began. The delivery of health and healthcare requires people working in differing roles, with explicit attention to the lived realities of the people in the roles of professional and patient. The new model will provide a construct that may make the attainment of equity in healthcare more possible with a focus on kindness for all.


Author(s):  
Fotis Aisopos ◽  
Magdalini Kardara ◽  
Vrettos Moulos ◽  
Athanasios Papaoikonomou ◽  
Konstantinos Tserpes ◽  
...  

In this chapter, we present the current state-of-the-art technology and methodologies regarding the evaluation of the provided quality of service in service oriented environments. With the emergence of service provisioning infrastructures and the adoption of Service Level Agreements acting as electronic contracts between service providers and customers, the need to control and validate the offered quality has appeared throughout the service lifecycle. This monitoring is performed either in the client side, using the customer’s Quality of Experience and employing trust and reputation mechanisms for the service selection and evaluation phase, or in the provider side, dynamically reconfiguring the service and allocating resources accordingly, in order to optimize the quality metrics guaranteed. The latter, of course, initially requires mapping of the high-level quality parameters, which are closer to the customer perception, to low-level computing terms related to the resource management process. Dynamic resource allocation based on quality monitoring and evaluation can lead to optimizing resource utilization and provider’s profits.


2013 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 111-119
Author(s):  
Audronė Lupeikienė ◽  
Jolanta Miliauskaitė ◽  
Albertas Čaplinskas

Paslaugų stiliaus architektūra tampa vyraujančia saityno paslaugomis grindžiamų sistemų kūrimo paradigma. Šiame straipsnyje pateikiama trijų dominuojančių paslaugų kokybės modeliavimo būdų: SQuaRE grindžiamo saityno paslaugų kokybės modelio, OASIS sudaryto saityno paslaugų kokybės modelio ir ontologija grindžiamo paslaugų kokybės modeliavimo būdo, pasiūlyto Beanchini su bendraautoriais, kritinė analizė. Pagrindinis darbo rezultatas yra straipsnyje parodomi analizuojamų būdų koncepciniai panašumai ir skirtumai, nagrinėjami trūkumai ir priežastys, neleidžiančios juos taikant adekvačiai modeliuoti paslaugų kokybės paslaugų stiliaus architektūros įmonių sistemose. Taip pat pateikiami argumentai, kad reikia sukurti naują, holistinį, paslaugų kokybės modeliavimo būdą.Critical analysis and elaboration of three prevailing approaches to model quality of serviceAudronė Lupeikienė, Jolanta Miliauskaitė, Albertas Čaplinskas SummaryThe service-oriented architecture (SOA) becomes dominant paradigm in the development of webbased systems. The paper critically analyses three prevailing approaches to SOA quality of service (QoS) modelling, namely, SQuaRE based Web Services Quality Model, OASIS Quality Model for Web Services and an ontology based QoS modelling approach proposed by Beanchini and co-authors. The main contribution of this paper is that it highlights both conceptual similarities and differences of the analysed approaches, examines their shortcomings and the reasons for their inability to model QoS adequately in service-oriented enterprise systems context. It also gives arguments for the need to develop a new, holistic QoS modelling approach.


F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1140
Author(s):  
Peter Lachman ◽  
Paul Batalden ◽  
Kris Vanhaecht

Background: It is twenty years since the Institute of Medicine (IOM) defined quality in healthcare, as comprising six domains: person-centredness, timeliness, efficiency, effectiveness, safety and equity. Since then, a new quality movement has emerged, with the development of numerous interventions aimed at improving quality, with a focus on accessibility, safety and effectiveness of care. Further gains in equity and timeliness have proven even more challenging. The challenge: With the emergence of “service-oriented” systems, complexity science, the challenges of climate change, the growth of social media and the internet and the new reality of COVID-19, the original domains proposed by the IOM invite reflection on their relevance and possibility for improvement. The possible solution: In this paper we propose a revised model of quality that is built on never-ending learning and includes new domains, such as Ecology and Transparency, which reflect the changing worldview of healthcare. We also introduce the concept of person- or “kin-centred care” to emphasise the shared humanity of people involved in the interdependent work. This is a more expansive view of what “person-centredness” began. The delivery of health and healthcare requires people working in differing roles, with explicit attention to the lived realities of the people in the roles of professional and patient. The new model will provide a construct that may make the attainment of equity in healthcare more possible with a focus on kindness for all.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document