Observed racial disparity in the negative predictive value of multi-parametric MRI for the diagnosis for prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 1343-1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Mahran ◽  
Kirtishri Mishra ◽  
Laura Bukavina ◽  
Fredrick Schumacher ◽  
Anna Quian ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mads Ryø Jochumsen ◽  
Jens Sörensen ◽  
Lars Poulsen Tolbod ◽  
Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen ◽  
Jørgen Frøkiær ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Both prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake and tumour blood flow (TBF) correlate with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) and hence prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential synergistic benefit of combining the two physiologic parameters for separating significant PCa from insignificant findings. Methods From previous studies of [82Rb]Rb positron emission tomography (PET) TBF in PCa, the 43 patients that underwent clinical [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET were selected for this retrospective study. Tumours were delineated on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET or magnetic resonance imaging. ISUP GG was recorded from 52 lesions. Results [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and [82Rb]Rb SUVmax correlated moderately with ISUP GG (rho = 0.59 and rho = 0.56, both p < 0.001) and with each other (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). A combined model of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [82Rb]Rb SUVmax separated ISUP GG > 2 from ISUP GG 1–2 and benign with an area-under-the-curve of 0.85, 96% sensitivity, 74% specificity, and 95% negative predictive value. The combined model performed significantly better than either tracer alone did (p < 0.001), primarily by reducing false negatives from five or six to one (p ≤ 0.025). Conclusion PSMA uptake and TBF provide complementary information about tumour aggressiveness. We suggest that a combined analysis of PSMA uptake and TBF could significantly improve the negative predictive value and allow non-invasive separation of significant from insignificant PCa.


2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4) ◽  
pp. 656-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciara S Marley ◽  
Timothy C Siegrist ◽  
Noel A. Armenakas ◽  
John A. Fracchia

2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael Sussman ◽  
Michele Fascelli ◽  
Thomas Frye ◽  
Arvin George ◽  
Steven Abboud ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Georgina Dominique ◽  
Wayne G. Brisbane ◽  
Robert E. Reiter

Abstract Purpose We present an overview of the literature regarding the use of MRI in active surveillance of prostate cancer. Methods Both MEDLINE® and Cochrane Library were queried up to May 2020 for studies of men on active surveillance with MRI and later confirmatory biopsy. The terms studied were ‘prostate cancer’ as the anchor followed by two of the following: active surveillance, surveillance, active monitoring, MRI, NMR, magnetic resonance imaging,  MRI, and multiparametric MRI. Studies were excluded if pathologic reclassification (GG1 →  ≥ GG2) and PI-RADS or equivalent was not reported. Results Within active surveillance, baseline MRI is effective for identifying clinically significant prostate cancer and thus associated with fewer reclassification events. A positive initial MRI (≥ PI-RADS 3) with GG1 identified at biopsy has a positive predictive value (PPV) of 35–40% for reclassification by 3 years. MRI possessed a stronger negative predictive value, with a negative MRI (≤ PI-RADS 2) yielding a negative predictive value of up to 85% at 3 years. Surveillance MRI, obtained after initial biopsy, yielded a PPV of 11–65% and NPV of 85–95% for reclassification. Conclusion MRI is useful for initial risk stratification of prostate cancer in men on active surveillance, especially if MRI is negative when imaging is obtained during surveillance. While useful, MRI cannot replace biopsy and further research is necessary to fully integrate MRI into active surveillance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document