The influence of position-dependency on surgical success in sleep apnea surgery — a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. Vonk ◽  
P. J. Rotteveel ◽  
M. J. L. Ravesloot ◽  
C. den Haan ◽  
N. de Vries
2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Binar ◽  
Omer Karakoc

Objective The aim of this study was to determine the general outcomes and surgical success rates of anterior palatoplasty (AP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Data Sources A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of published data were performed by searching the Cochrane, SAGE, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases, from January 1, 2007, to March 27, 2017, using relevant keywords. Review Methods The search scanned for studies with patients who had undergone AP (with or without tonsillectomy) as a single-stage, single-level surgical intervention for treatment of OSA. Two independent reviewers (M.B. and O.K.) inspected titles and abstracts of the studies according to established criteria. The full texts were then reviewed to extract the clinical and polysomnographic data. The primary outcome was the surgical success rate, defined as a reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 50% or greater and an AHI of less than 20 postoperatively. The PRISMA statement was followed. Results After systematic evaluation of potentially relevant articles, 14 studies were downloaded, and 6 studies, consisting of 170 patients, met the study criteria. A fixed effects model was used to analyze the data. The surgical success rate of AP was 60.6%. No serious complications were reported in the literature. Conclusion The results of the present meta-analysis support AP as a moderately effective surgical method for the treatment of OSA. Comparative and randomized controlled prospective studies showing long-term results, with pre- and postoperative data, should be conducted to demonstrate the exact outcomes and reliability of this surgical technique.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 878-892
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Napoli ◽  
Linda D. Vallino

Purpose The 2 most commonly used operations to treat velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) are superiorly based pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty, both of which may result in hyponasal speech and airway obstruction. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe the bilateral buccal flap revision palatoplasty (BBFRP) as an alternative technique to manage VPI while minimizing these risks and (b) conduct a systematic review of the evidence of BBFRP on speech and other clinical outcomes. A report comparing the speech of a child with hypernasality before and after BBFRP is presented. Method A review of databases was conducted for studies of buccal flaps to treat VPI. Using the principles of a systematic review, the articles were read, and data were abstracted for study characteristics that were developed a priori. With respect to the case report, speech and instrumental data from a child with repaired cleft lip and palate and hypernasal speech were collected and analyzed before and after surgery. Results Eight articles were included in the analysis. The results were positive, and the evidence is in favor of BBFRP in improving velopharyngeal function, while minimizing the risk of hyponasal speech and obstructive sleep apnea. Before surgery, the child's speech was characterized by moderate hypernasality, and after surgery, it was judged to be within normal limits. Conclusion Based on clinical experience and results from the systematic review, there is sufficient evidence that the buccal flap is effective in improving resonance and minimizing obstructive sleep apnea. We recommend BBFRP as another approach in selected patients to manage VPI. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9919352


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document