scholarly journals Obstruction level associated with outcome in hypoglossal nerve stimulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Wirth ◽  
Maximilian Bautz ◽  
Franziska von Meyer ◽  
Benedikt Hofauer ◽  
Ulrich Strassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Soft Palate ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Base Level ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Good Treatment Response ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Purpose Selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation (sHNS) constitutes an effective surgical alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). sHNS results in tongue protrusion and consecutive alleviation of obstructions at the tongue base level (lower obstructions). Furthermore, obstructions at the soft palate level (upper obstructions) may be prevented through palatoglossal coupling as seen on sleep endoscopy. However, it has not been studied if the distribution of obstruction level during a whole night measurement is a relevant factor for the treatment outcome. Methods Obstruction levels were measured with a manometry system during a whole night of sleep in 26 patients with OSA (f = 1, m = 25; age 59.4 ± 11.3; BMI = 29.6 ± 3.6) either before (n = 9) or after sHNS implantation (n = 12). Five patients received a measurement before and after implantation. Obstructions were categorized into velar (soft palate and above), infravelar (below soft palate), and multilevel obstructions. An association between obstruction level and treatment outcome was calculated. Results The mean distribution of preoperative obstruction level could be divided into the following: 38% velar, 46% multilevel, and 16% infravelar obstructions. Patients with a good treatment response (defined as AHI < 15/h and AHI reduction of 50%) had fewer preoperative velar obstructions compared to non-responder (17% vs. 54%, p-value = 0.006). In patients measured after sHNS implantation, a significantly higher rate of multilevel obstructions per hour was measured in non-responders (p-value = 0.012). Conclusions Selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation was more effective in patients with fewer obstructions at the soft palate level. Manometry may be a complementary diagnostic procedure for the selection of patients for HNS.

Clinical Radiographic Predictors of Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

2020 ◽  
pp. 019459982096314
Author(s):  
Clara H. Lee ◽  
Everett G. Seay ◽  
James W. Reese ◽  
Xin Wu ◽  
Richard J. Schwab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Soft Palate ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Index Reduction ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Objective To determine if clinically acquired cephalometric measurements, specifically soft palate size, can predict hypoglossal nerve stimulation outcomes. Study Design Combined prospective cohort study and retrospective review. Setting US sleep otolaryngology training program. Methods Adults with obstructive sleep apnea and apneahypopnea index greater than 15 events/h who underwent hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Eligible subjects had diagnostic preoperative sleep studies and full-night efficacy postoperative studies for analysis. Lateral neck x-rays were obtained as part of routine clinical care and measured for key cephalometric variables by trained head and neck radiologists. Continuous variables were compared using the Student t test, while χ2 testing was used for categorical variables. Results Fifty-one patients met all study criteria. On average, patients were white, middle aged, and overweight. Following hypoglossal nerve stimulation, the overall cohort achieved a significant apnea-hypopnea index reduction from 36.7 events/h to 20.6 events/h ( P < .01) and a response rate of 47% (defined as apnea-hypopnea index reduction >50% and apnea-hypopnea index <20 events/h). On average, therapy responders had significantly thinner soft palates than nonresponders (13.4 ± 3.8 mm vs 16.0 ± 3.4 mm, P = .045). Conclusions Patient-specific anatomic factors, specifically soft palate thickness, may help identify optimal candidates for hypoglossal nerve stimulation. A larger, prospective study including both anatomic and physiologic variables is required to validate these findings.

Tongue-Based Procedures in Treating Refractory Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Down Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Paul B. Lee ◽  
Michael T. Chung ◽  
Jared Johnson ◽  
Jordyn Lucas ◽  
Caitlin R. Priest ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Objective: There is a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in pediatric and adult Down Syndrome (DS) patients that is refractory to adenotonsillectomy and continuous positive airway pressure. Newer treatment modalities have emerged with improved outcomes. The objective is to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the clinical outcomes of OSA in pediatric and adult DS patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulation using Inspire, midline posterior glossectomy plus lingual tonsillectomy (MPG + LT), and combined genioglossus advancement plus radiofrequency (GGS + RF). Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed followed by a meta-analysis. Studies with preoperative and post-operative Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) values were included with patients serving as their own control. Results: Across 5 studies, 56 patients were analyzed. The mean reduction in AHI was statistically significant before vs. after procedure ( P < .001 for hypoglossal nerve stimulation using Inspire with a paired 2-tailed t-test and P = .031 for MPG + LT). Although individual patient AHI values were unavailable in the GGS + RF study, the standard difference in mean AHI was also significant for GGS + RF with P = .001. Device malfunction was the most common complication for Inspire while postoperative bleeding was observed for MPG + LT and nasopharyngeal obstruction and retropalatal collapse were observed for GGS + RF. Conclusion: This review reveals significant improvement in AHI with Inspire, MPG + LT, and GGS + RF for DS patients with refractory OSA. Further investigation is needed for comparison between these 3 therapies.

818 A Ghost from the Past: Unmasked Insomnia Affecting Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy Adherence

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A319-A320
Author(s):  
Elena Stuewe ◽  
Aarti Grover ◽  
Peter Ostrow ◽  
Greg Schumaker ◽  
Joel Oster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Chronic Insomnia ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Therapy Adherence ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
History Of

Abstract Introduction Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is an efficacious option for treating moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, there is sparse evidence regarding tolerance and adherence to HNS therapy in patients with a diagnosis of insomnia. Report of case(s) A 57-year-old man with well-controlled depression presented for evaluation for HNS therapy. He had been diagnosed with moderate OSA with an apnea-hypopnea index of 22/hour, intolerant of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement device. He underwent uvulopalatopharyngoplasty without significant improvement. At the time of initial evaluation, he denied history of insomnia and prior sleep aid use. He subsequently underwent successful HNS device implantation and activation. One week after HNS initiation, the patient reported new symptoms of significant difficulty with sleep onset and inability to fall back asleep, which was worse than his untreated OSA symptoms. Device interrogation did not reveal any hardware problems. Adjustments to start delay, pause time and device configuration with awake endoscopy did not improve tolerance. Subsequently, the patient disclosed a remote history of insomnia, which was treated with multiple hypnotics in addition to cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi) and had resolved. He was diagnosed with recurrent chronic insomnia, for which eszopiclone was initiated without significant improvement. He eventually agreed to CBTi, with partial improvement in device tolerance and improvement in insomnia symptoms. Conclusion This case highlights that HNS therapy adherence can be affected by prior history of, or a current diagnosis of insomnia. Our patient had a predisposition for insomnia that was well controlled prior to HNS therapy initiation. The onset of recurrent insomnia with HNS activation suggests that HNS was a precipitating factor for his now chronic insomnia. Although there is insufficient evidence to suggest whether history of insomnia should affect the decision to initiate HNS therapy, this case illustrates the importance of screening for insomnia at pre-implant evaluation. Our center is now routinely screening for a history of insomnia to identify patients who may benefit from treatment prior to HNS implantation. Larger studies are needed to explore a possible relationship between insomnia and HNS adherence. Support (if any):

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in Veterans with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
pp. 2275-2280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Sarber ◽  
Katherine W. Chang ◽  
Madison V. Epperson ◽  
Meredith E. Tabangin ◽  
Mekibib Altaye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (Meta-analytic Study)

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mahmoud ◽  
A Mohamed ◽  
A Mohamed ◽  
H Nasr
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Standardized Mean Difference

Abstract Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a serious, potentially life-threatening disorder. There are many treatment modalities are being used, but none of them gained consensus. Continuous positive airway pressure considered the most widely accepted treatment of OSA but very poor adherence limits its effectiveness, thus was the need for alternative therapy of high compliance and effective for long term. Aim of the Work To perform a meta-analysis of the available studies included outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation to evaluate its effectiveness as a choice of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Patients and Methods The study included published medical articles that evaluated the efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation as treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with outcomes for primary outcome measures apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and for secondary outcome measures Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) before and after implantation. Results Eight prospective studies with 329 patients were included in this met analysis. At 12 months, statistical analysis demonstrated significant reductions in AHI, ODI with standardized mean difference of -1.3940 (95% CI: -1.7745 to -1.0136; P = 0.0042), -0.9188 (95% CI: -1.3040 to -0.5337; p = 0.0002) respectively, and -not significant- reduction in ESS, FOSQ with standardized mean difference of -1.0365 (95% CI: -1.1889 to -0.8841; p = 0.2290), 1.0545 (95% CI: 0.8867 to 1.2223; p = 0.4922), respectively. Similar were observed at 6 months. Conclusion Hypoglossal nerve stimulation results in significant improvement of primary outcome measures of OSA with significant reduction of apnea episodes. It could be considered as an effective -but still of high cost- alternative for OSA patients. Further studies comparing HNS to other therapies are needed.

scholarly journals 0552 Radiographic Predictors of Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

SLEEP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A220-A220
Author(s):  
Clara H Lee ◽  
James Reese ◽  
Everett G Seay ◽  
Xin Wu ◽  
Raj C Dedhia
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Predictors Of Response ◽  
Obstructive Sleep
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document