Study on the spatial changes concerning ecosystem services value in Lhasa River Basin, China

Author(s):  
Lei Huang ◽  
Chunli He ◽  
Bo Wang
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
卢慧婷 LU Huiting ◽  
黄琼中 HUANG Qiongzhong ◽  
朱捷缘 ZHU Jieyuan ◽  
郑天晨 ZHENG Tianchen ◽  
严岩 YAN Yan ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yili Zhang ◽  
Chunlian Wang ◽  
Wanqi Bai ◽  
Zhaofeng Wang ◽  
Yanli Tu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiutan Liu ◽  
Zongjun Gao ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Yingzhi Li ◽  
Chen Yu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Wutian Cai ◽  
Yingzhi Li ◽  
Tingting Geng ◽  
Zhiyin Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Li ◽  
Hongying Luo ◽  
Tiesong Hu ◽  
Dongguo Shao ◽  
Yuanlai Cui ◽  
...  

Understanding vegetation dynamics is necessary to address potential ecological threats and develop sustainable ecosystem management at high altitudes. In this study, we revealed the spatiotemporal characteristics of vegetation growth in the Lhasa River Basin using net primary productivity (NPP) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) during the period of 2000–2005. The roles of climatic factors and specific anthropogenic activities in vegetation dynamics were also identified, including positive or negative effects and the degree of impact. The results indicated that the interannual series of NPP and NDVI in the whole basin both had a continuous increasing trend from 102 to 128 gC m−2 yr−1 and from 0.417 to 0.489 (p < 0.05), respectively. The strongest advanced trends (>2 gC m−2 yr−1 or >0.005 yr−1) were detected in mainly the southeastern and northeastern regions. Vegetation dynamics were not detected in 10% of the basin. Only 20% of vegetation dynamics were driven by climatic conditions, and precipitation was the controlling climatic factor determining vegetation growth. Accordingly, anthropogenic activities made a great difference in vegetation coverage, accounting for about 70%. The construction of urbanization and reservoir led to vegetation degradation, but the farmland practices contributed the vegetation growth. Reservoir construction had an adverse impact on vegetation within 6 km of the river, and the direct damage to vegetation was within 1 km. The impacts of urbanization were more serious than that of reservoir construction. Urban sprawl had an adverse impact on vegetation within a 6 km distance from the surrounding river and resulted in the degradation of vegetation, especially within a 3 km range. Intensive fertilization and guaranteed irrigation improved the cropland ecosystem conditions, creating a favorable effect on the accumulation of crop organic matter in a range of 5 km, with an NPP trend value of 1.2 gC m−2 yr−1. The highly intensive grazing activity forced ecological environmental pressures such that the correlation between livestock numbers and vegetation growth trend was significantly linear negative.


2020 ◽  
Vol 165 ◽  
pp. 03055
Author(s):  
Su Huidong ◽  
Liu Yin ◽  
Lu Huiting ◽  
Wang Dongbo ◽  
Jin Tianian

As a political, economic and cultural center of the Tibet Autonomous Region, the Lhasa River needs to take planning and management of the basin. In the past 60 years, the temperature of Lhasa River Basin has been increasing gradually at an annual rate of 0.047 ° C, which leads to the water cycle variation of the river basin and its associated aquatic ecology and environment continue to change and evolve, and ecological environmental protection is affected by more uncertain factors. Based on the assessment of the ecological environment of the Lhasa River Basin, the comprehensive planning suggestions for the Lhasa River Basin were proposed from the aspects of water environment, land use, ecological pattern, and economic and social development. These suggestions are drawn on the examples of integrated planning and management of catchment in foreign countries and are referred to as the comprehensive planning of the seven major river basins in China.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
包小婷 BAO Xiaoting ◽  
丁陆彬 DING Lubin ◽  
姚帅臣 YAO Shuaichen ◽  
王景升 WANG Jingsheng ◽  
石培礼 SHI Peili ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document