Production and energetic utilization of wood from short rotation coppice—a life cycle assessment

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Roedl
Author(s):  
Daniela Fürtner ◽  
Lea Ranacher ◽  
E. Alejandro Perdomo Echenique ◽  
Peter Schwarzbauer ◽  
Franziska Hesser

AbstractThe establishment of new value chains raises expectations in economic and social benefits. To determine whether these expectations can be fulfilled or whether there are also negative consequences, social aspects should be assessed as early as the R&D phase. Potential social impacts can be assessed with the help of a social life cycle assessment (SLCA). A common problem in SLCA studies is the large number of social aspects. Thus, it is important to prioritize the most relevant aspects. Scholars agree that socioeconomic indicators should not be selected on a purely intuitive and common sense basis and that a standardized approach is missing. A three-step process has been developed to identify the most vulnerable and relevant social aspects. These three steps were implemented into a case study to empirically test the method. Short-rotation-coppice as an alternative form of agricultural dendromass production is one possibility to obtain wood resources for the processing of bio-based products. The use of agricultural land for dendromass production promises additional income for the region’s farmers and job opportunities for the local population. The extant literature shows that the most frequently addressed impacts are related to workers’ health and safety aspects. The outcome of this study aims to support future research by identifying an appropriate approach for the selection of indicators in SLCA. For studies with a similar focus, the proposed set of indicators can be used as a framework in itself or serve as a basis for the choice of relevant social indicators.


2017 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 343-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goretty M. Dias ◽  
Nathan W. Ayer ◽  
Kumudinie Kariyapperuma ◽  
Naresh Thevathasan ◽  
Andrew Gordon ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 273 ◽  
pp. 468-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Luca Tasca ◽  
Riccardo Bacci di Capaci ◽  
Leonardo Tognotti ◽  
Monica Puccini

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-68
Author(s):  
András Polgár ◽  
Zoltán Kovács ◽  
Veronika Elekné Fodor ◽  
András Bidló

Abstract Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) was developed as a tool for sustainable, decision-supporting environmental management. Applying agricultural sector-LCA in order to achieve both internal (comparative) and external (efficiency enhancing) benefits is a priority. Since the life-cycle assessment of products and processes attracts great interest, applying the method in agriculture is relevant. Our study undertakes a comparative environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) of local arable crop production technologies used for the main cultivated plants: maize, sunflower, lucerne, cereals, and canola (environmental data in the territorial approach calculated on a 1 ha unit and in the quantitative approach calculated on 1 t of produce). We prepared an environmental inventory of the arable crop production technologies, constructed the life-cycle models, and executed the impact assessment. We also compiled an environmental ranking of technologies. In the impact interpretation, we compared the results with the values of short rotation energy plantations in each impact category. We analysed carbon footprints closely. The obtained results help better assess environmental impacts, climate risks, and climate change as they pertain to arable crop production technologies, which advances the selection of appropriate technologies adjusted to environmental sensitivities.


2015 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 449-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Rugani ◽  
Katarzyna Golkowska ◽  
Ian Vázquez-Rowe ◽  
Daniel Koster ◽  
Enrico Benetto ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 783-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara González-García ◽  
Blas Mola-Yudego ◽  
Richard J. Murphy

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 460-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Caputo ◽  
Stephen B. Balogh ◽  
Timothy A. Volk ◽  
Leonard Johnson ◽  
Maureen Puettmann ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
E. Alejandro Perdomo E. ◽  
Peter Schwarzbauer ◽  
Daniela Fürtner ◽  
Franziska Hesser

AbstractIn Europe, poplar and other fast-growing tree species are considered valuable resources for meeting the required wood demand of the rising bioeconomy. The agricultural technique of short rotation coppice (SRC) has gained relevance to ease the pressure of the demand for wood from forests. Previous studies have implemented the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to evaluate such systems’ potential environmental impacts. These studies present different outcomes, though a general pattern on the potential benefit of SRC is observed. The variation of relevant methodological options, such as goal and scope, system boundary, functional unit, reference system, data source, characterization models, and impact categories assessed can significantly affect the results. A consequence of this discrepancy is its effect on results’ interpretation, making the absolute comparison of case studies challenging and hindering the understanding of the potential impacts of SRC LCAs in support of developing a sustainable bioeconomy. Therefore, the current research attempts to understand the methodological implementation of LCA in assessing SRC value chains. Through literature research, studies are analyzed based on the four LCA phases. One of the results of this study shows how most of the articles focus on assessing the impact category related to climate change, while other environmental issues that are particularly relevant for agricultural woody biomass systems are seldomly evaluated. By discussing the state of the art of SRC LCA, this review paper attempts to suggest improvements that will allow future LCA studies to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the overall environmental impact of SRC systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document