The enforcement of china’s anti-monopoly law during the financial crisis: A comparative study

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-644
Author(s):  
Pinguang Ying
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Comparative Study

scholarly journals A Comparative Study on Performance of Open and Close-ended Mutual Funds in Pakistan

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 300
Author(s):  
Waqas Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Sohaib Roomi ◽  
Muhammad Ramzan ◽  
Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman ◽  
Sajjad Ahmad Baig
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Mutual Funds ◽  
Mutual Fund ◽  
Portfolio Performance ◽  
Sample Period ◽  
Market Portfolio ◽  
Fund Industry ◽  
Mutual Fund Industry ◽  
Better Than

This paper is based on the comparison of Pakistani open-ended and close-ended mutual funds performance. That study focus on income, balance and equity schemes of open-ended and close-ended mutual funds. The performance of these funds evaluates using Sortino measure, Shrape measure, Treynor measure, Jenssen differtial measure and Inforamtion measure. The sample for the study consists of 73 funds from 2007 to 2012. Results show open-ended mutual funds performance is better than close-ended mutual funds. KSE (market portfolio) performance is grater over the all sample base mutual funds. Most risk adjusted funds returns are negative, which probably due to mutual fund industry set back by financial crisis during sample period.  

Sailing a Ship through Stormy Waters Requires a Compass

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-498
Author(s):  
Christian Olaf Christiansen
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Free Market ◽  
Political Rhetoric ◽  
Financial Derivatives ◽  
The Political ◽  
Seminal Work ◽  
Financial Deregulation ◽  
Political Justification ◽  
Public Debates

Whereas many scholars have concluded that neoliberalism as well as deregulation was among the key causes of the financial crisis of 2008, much less work has been done on particular reforms and the specific political rhetoric which justified them. This is a comparative study of the political justification of financial deregulation, examining two spectacular cases: the repeal of Glass-Steagall in 1999 and the passing of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act in 2000. There was a widespread, outspoken uncertainty about the consequences of financial deregulation in the 1990s public debates. Building upon Mark Blyth’s seminal work on economic ideas, this article traces the free market ideas and rhetoric that were invoked to reduce this uncertainty about financial derivatives and deregulation, thereby serving as an enabling factor for deregulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document