Single-Stage vs. Two-Stage Management for Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct stones: A Prospective Randomized Trial with Long-Term Follow-up

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 947-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoqian Ding ◽  
Wang Cai ◽  
Mingfang Qin
2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. AB152
Author(s):  
Shinpei Doi ◽  
Ichiro Yasuda ◽  
Masanori Nakashima ◽  
Takuji Iwashita ◽  
Keisuke Iwata ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. AB189
Author(s):  
Guido Costamagna ◽  
Andrea Tringali ◽  
Massimiliano Mutignani ◽  
Vincenzo Perri ◽  
Giuseppe Zuccala’

Endoscopy ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (05) ◽  
pp. 411-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Meyenberger ◽  
U. Meierhofer ◽  
C. Michel-Harder ◽  
J. Knuchel ◽  
H. P. Wirth ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadi Kolahdoozan ◽  
Rasoul Sotoudehmanesh ◽  
Morteza Khatibian ◽  
Ali Ali-Asgari ◽  
Shadi Shahraeeni ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1142-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiong Lu ◽  
Xian-Ze Xiong ◽  
Yao Cheng ◽  
Yi-Xin Lin ◽  
Rong-Xing Zhou ◽  
...  

No consensus exists regarding the optimal management of concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones (CBDS). Previous studies showed a significant association between the presence of obstructive jaundice and increased risk of postoperative complications and conversion to open surgery. This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of one-stage (laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC] plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration) management versus two-stage (preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincterotomy 1 LC) management for patients with obstructive jaundice, concomitant gallbladder stones, and CBDS. One-stage management (n = 88) or two-stage management (n = 122) was used for 210 eligible patients between January 2009 and March 2011. Both types of management proved to be effective and safe. No significant difference was observed in terms of stone clearance from the common bile duct (CBD), postoperative morbidity, mortality, or conversion to open surgery. However, one-stage management was more cost-effective and decreased the number of procedures. In addition, postoperative hospital stay and operative time were shorter for patients who received one-stage management. Especially for patients with CBD greater than 1 cm in diameter, one-stage management is a better choice.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Topal ◽  
K. Vromman ◽  
R. Aerts ◽  
C. Verslype ◽  
W. Van Steenbergen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document