Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stones

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Topal ◽  
K. Vromman ◽  
R. Aerts ◽  
C. Verslype ◽  
W. Van Steenbergen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Stage Versus ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Stage Management ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Cost Categories

One-stage versus Two-stage Management for Concomitant Gallbladder Stones and Common Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1142-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiong Lu ◽  
Xian-Ze Xiong ◽  
Yao Cheng ◽  
Yi-Xin Lin ◽  
Rong-Xing Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Obstructive Jaundice ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Stage Management ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Gallbladder Stones

No consensus exists regarding the optimal management of concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones (CBDS). Previous studies showed a significant association between the presence of obstructive jaundice and increased risk of postoperative complications and conversion to open surgery. This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of one-stage (laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC] plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration) management versus two-stage (preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincterotomy 1 LC) management for patients with obstructive jaundice, concomitant gallbladder stones, and CBDS. One-stage management (n = 88) or two-stage management (n = 122) was used for 210 eligible patients between January 2009 and March 2011. Both types of management proved to be effective and safe. No significant difference was observed in terms of stone clearance from the common bile duct (CBD), postoperative morbidity, mortality, or conversion to open surgery. However, one-stage management was more cost-effective and decreased the number of procedures. In addition, postoperative hospital stay and operative time were shorter for patients who received one-stage management. Especially for patients with CBD greater than 1 cm in diameter, one-stage management is a better choice.

One-stage laparoscopic procedure versus two-stage procedure in the management of common bile duct stones in patients aged 75 and more

2020 ◽  
Vol 157 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
D. Gantois ◽  
Y. Goudard ◽  
S. Bourgouin ◽  
G. Pauleau ◽  
B. de La Villéon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Laparoscopic Procedure ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
One Stage

Safety and efficacy of one-stage total laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in children

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1831-1836 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. O. Muller ◽  
M. B. Boimond ◽  
A. Rega ◽  
D. Michelet ◽  
A. El Ghoneimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Laparoscopic Treatment ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
One Stage
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document