Feasibility of Total Gastrectomy with D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer and Predictive Factors for Its Short- and Long-Term Outcomes

ntroduction. Currently, total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard surgical treatment for proximal gastric cancer at the resectable stages (I-III). The issue of advisability of splenectomy as a component of lymphadenectomy remains a controversial one, especially when the tumor is localized in the region of the body or cardiac region of the stomach.The aim of the study was to compare immediate and long-term outcomes, including the quality of life, between spleen preserving and spleen removing surgeries.Methods. The study included 363 patients with gastric cancer II-III stages, localized in the upper and/or the middle third of the stomach, who underwent surgery at the Voronezh Regional Clinical Oncology Hospital and the Voronezh Clinical Hospital of the Russian Railway-Medicine in 2015-2017. All patients were conditionally divided into 2 groups for comparative retrospective analysis. All patients of the first (experimental or spleen-preserved) group (144 patients) were performed R0 total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, including splenic hilar nodes (№ 10,11) removal without splenectomy. Patients of the second (control or splenectomy) group (219 patients) were performed R0 total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and prophylactic splenectomy (for splenic hilar nodes removal).Results. The average duration of the operation and the volume of blood loss did not differ in both groups. The incidence of early postoperative surgical complications was lower in the spleen-preserved group. Splenectomy was associated with more severe complications of class 4 and 5 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Conclusion. Parameters of the 1- and 3-year overall survival rate did not differ in both groups. The results of the GSRS questionnaire were similar in both groups, excluding reflux-esophageal symptoms scale. The reflux scale demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant advantage of spleen preservation.

Download Full-text

Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymph Node Dissection for cT2 Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes

International Surgery ◽

10.9738/intsurg-d-15-00027.1 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 100 (9-10) ◽

pp. 1315-1322 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kei Hosoda ◽

Shinichi Sakuramoto ◽

Natsuya Katada ◽

Keishi Yamashita ◽

Hiromitsu Moriya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Distal Gastrectomy ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Controlled Study ◽

D2 Lymphadenectomy ◽

Open Distal Gastrectomy ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Relapse Free Survival ◽

Free Survival

The purpose of this study was to determine whether laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D2 lymphadenectomy could be a standard treatment for cT2N0-1 gastric cancer. There have been few reports regarding the long-term outcomes of patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent LDG with D2 lymphadenectomy. The study included 32 patients who underwent LDG with D2 lymphadenectomy and 44 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 lymphadenectomy. There was no clinicopathologic difference in patient background between the groups. Operative duration was significantly longer in the LDG group than in the ODG group (297 ± 12 minutes versus 226 ± 10 minutes; P < 0.001). However, blood loss was significantly less (90 ± 27 mL versus 314 ± 23 mL; P < 0.001) and the number of days to assisted ambulation significantly shorter (1.1 ± 0.1 days versus 1.5 ± 0.1 days; P = 0.010) in the LDG group than in the ODG group. Median follow-up period was 60 months. The 5-year overall survival rates for the LDG group and the ODG group were 89.5% and 97.1%, respectively. The 5-year relapse-free survival rates for the LDG group and the ODG group were 88.0% and 97.7%, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall and relapse-free survival rates between the groups. LDG with D2 lymphadenectomy for cT2N0-1 gastric cancer is oncologically and technically safe and feasible, and is an option in the surgeon's arsenal. Randomized controlled study including the investigation of cost-effectiveness should be conducted.

Download Full-text

Radiofrequency ablation versus traditional liver resection and chemotherapy for liver metastases from gastric cancer

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/0300060520940509 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 48 (7) ◽

pp. 030006052094050

Author(s):

Kezhong Tang ◽

Bo Zhang ◽

Linping Dong ◽

Lantian Wang ◽

Zhe Tang

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Radiofrequency Ablation ◽

Liver Resection ◽

Liver Metastasis ◽

Liver Metastases ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Local Treatment ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Short And Long Term

Objective To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus liver resection and chemotherapy for liver metastases from gastric cancer. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 50 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy and local treatments for liver metastases (RFA, n = 20; liver resection, n = 20; and chemotherapy, n = 10) from 2008 to 2018. Results The short- and long-term outcomes of each local treatment were evaluated. The median overall survival (OS) after RFA was similar to that after liver resection (20 vs. 20 months, respectively) and longer than that after chemotherapy (20 vs. 10 months, respectively). The 3-year OS and progression-free survival (PFS) rates after RFA were 20% and 10%, respectively, while those in the liver resection group were 23.5% and 23.5%, respectively. The 3-year OS rate after chemotherapy was 10%. The size and number of metastases were prognostic factors for patients with gastric cancer with liver metastasis without statistical significance. Conclusions Among patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer, OS and PFS were satisfactory and comparable between RFA and liver resection but better than those of chemotherapy. RFA is an appropriate option for patients with gastric cancer who have a solitary liver metastasis measuring ≤3.0 cm.

Download Full-text