scholarly journals Capsule Commentary on Flynn et al., Development and Validation of a Single-Item Screener for Self-Reporting Sexual Problems in U.S. Adults

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1532-1532
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Jackson
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1468-1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Flynn ◽  
Stacy Tessler Lindau ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Jennifer Barsky Reese ◽  
Diana D. Jeffery ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 42-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Baussard ◽  
Anne Stoebner-Delbarre ◽  
Laurence Bonnabel ◽  
Marie-Eve Huteau ◽  
Aurélie Gastou ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chankon Kim ◽  
Hanjoon Lee

Many past investigations of family members’ perceptions of their relative influence in family decision making show a lack of convergence in multiple reports. This, in turn, represents a serious threat to validity in attempts to depict the structure of family decision influence. These studies warn against using single-item measures of family members’ influence even in cases involving multiple respondents. In this study, using multiple-respondent, multiple-item data, the authors develop triadic measures of children's influence in four categories of product purchase decisions that exhibit desirable levels of convergent and discriminant validity. The process of measure development and validation demonstrates a methodology that combines the traditional measure purification process, confirmatory factor analysis, and multiple-influence, multiple-rater data analysis procedures.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel S. Monfort ◽  
John J. Graybeal ◽  
Amanda E. Harwood ◽  
Patrick E. McKnight ◽  
Tyler H. Shaw

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e103469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Konrath ◽  
Brian P. Meier ◽  
Brad J. Bushman

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 111-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Konrath ◽  
Brian P. Meier ◽  
Brad J. Bushman

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura D. Scherer ◽  
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher

The 10-item validated Medical Maximizer-Minimizer Scale (MMS-10) assesses patients’ preferences for aggressive v. more passive approaches to health care. However, because many research or clinical situations do not allow for use of a 10-item scale, we developed a single-item maximizer-minimizer elicitation question (the MM1) based on our experiences describing the construct to patient groups, clinical researchers, and the public. In 2 large samples of US adults ( N = 368 and N = 814), the correlation between MMS-10 scores and the MM1 was .52 and .60, respectively. Both measures were robust predictors of medical preferences in a set of 12 hypothetical scenarios, and both had strong (and roughly equivalent) associations with 7 self-report measures of health care utilization. Our results demonstrate that the MM1 is a valid, brief elicitation of maximizing-minimizing preferences that can be used in clinical or research contexts where the 10-item scale is infeasible.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
J. Stuart Wolf ◽  
Rodney L. Dunn ◽  
Martin G. Sanda ◽  
David P. Wood ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document