Determination of Triaxial Residual Stress in Plasma-Sprayed Hydroxyapatite (HAp) Deposited on Titanium Substrate by X-ray Diffraction

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1238-1250
Author(s):  
N. Bosh ◽  
H. Mozaffari-Jovein ◽  
C. Müller
1988 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Porter ◽  
Dan O. Morehouse ◽  
Mike Brauss ◽  
Robert R. Hosbons ◽  
John H. Root ◽  
...  

AbstractStudies have been ongoing at Defence Research Establishment Atlantic on the evaluation of non-destructive techniques for residual stress determination in structures. These techniques have included neutron diffraction, x-ray diffraction and blind-hole drilling. In conjunction with these studies, the applicability of these procedures to aid in metallurgical and failure analysis investigations has been explored. The x-ray diffraction technique was applied to investigate the failure mechanism in several bent turbo blower rotor shafts. All examinations had to be non-destructive in nature as the shafts were considered repairable. It was determined that residual stress profiles existed in the distorted shafts which strongly indicated the presence of martensitic microstuctures. These microstructures are considered unacceptable for these shafts due to the potential for cracking or in-service residual stress relaxation which could lead to future shaft distortion.


2016 ◽  
Vol 368 ◽  
pp. 99-102
Author(s):  
Lukáš Zuzánek ◽  
Ondřej Řidký ◽  
Nikolaj Ganev ◽  
Kamil Kolařík

The basic principle of the X-ray diffraction analysis is based on the determination of components of residual stresses. They are determined on the basis of the change in the distance between atomic planes. The method is limited by a relatively small depth in which the X-ray beam penetrates into the analysed materials. For determination of residual stresses in the surface layer the X-ray diffraction and electrolytic polishing has to be combined. The article is deals with the determination of residual stress and real material structure of a laser-welded steel sample with an oxide surface layer. This surface layer is created during the rolling and it prevents the material from its corrosion. Before the X-ray diffraction analysis can be performed, this surface layer has to be removed. This surface layer cannot be removed with the help of electrolytic polishing and, therefore, it has to be removed mechanically. This mechanical procedure creates “technological” residual stress in the surface layer. This additional residual stress is removed by the electrolytic polishing in the depth between 20 and 80 μm. Finally, the real structure and residual stresses can be determined by using the X-ray diffraction techniques.


2004 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Vila ◽  
M.L. Martínez ◽  
C. Prieto ◽  
P. Miranzo ◽  
M.I. Osendi ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ph. Goudeau ◽  
K. F. Badawi ◽  
A. Naudon ◽  
G. Gladyszewski

1992 ◽  
Vol 60 (18) ◽  
pp. 2216-2218 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Specht ◽  
C. J. Sparks ◽  
C. J. McHargue

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juciane Maria Alves ◽  
Luiz Paulo Brandao ◽  
Andersan dos Santos Paula

ABSTRACT The 304L austenitic stainless steel is susceptible to deformation induced martensitic transformation. This phase transformation depends on the temperature as well as on the mode, rate and level of deformation. In this work the phases and residual stresses of a 304L TRIP steel where martensitic transformation was induced by cold rolling were investigated by X-ray diffraction XRD. The analyses were performed for different sample thicknesses. The results showed that the phase composition and the residual stresses are strongly dependent on sample thickness. All samples showed a compressive residual stress.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document