Magnetic Liver Retraction: an Incision-Less Approach for Less Invasive Bariatric Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1068-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Davis ◽  
Gerardo Davalos ◽  
Camila Ortega ◽  
Sugong Chen ◽  
Scott Schimpke ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. S196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Guerron ◽  
Camila Ortega ◽  
Jesse Gutnick ◽  
Madhu Siddeswarappa ◽  
Juan Alvarez ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 237 (1) ◽  
pp. R1-R17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Haluzík ◽  
Helena Kratochvílová ◽  
Denisa Haluzíková ◽  
Miloš Mráz

Increasing worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its accompanying pathologies such as obesity, arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia represents one of the most important challenges of current medicine. Despite intensive efforts, high percentage of patients with type 2 diabetes does not achieve treatment goals and struggle with increasing body weight and poor glucose control. While novel classes of antidiabetic medications such as incretin-based therapies and gliflozins have some favorable characteristics compared to older antidiabetics, the only therapeutic option shown to substantially modify the progression of diabetes or to achieve its remission is bariatric surgery. Its efficacy in the treatment of diabetes is well established, but the exact underlying modes of action are still only partially described. They include restriction of food amount, enhanced passage of chymus into distal part of small intestine with subsequent modification of gastrointestinal hormones and bile acids secretion, neural mechanisms, changes in gut microbiota and many other possible mechanisms underscoring the importance of the gut in the regulation of glucose metabolism. In addition to bariatric surgery, less-invasive endoscopic methods based on the principles of bariatric surgery were introduced and showed promising results. This review highlights the role of the intestine in the regulation of glucose homeostasis focusing on the mechanisms of action of bariatric and especially endoscopic methods of the treatment of diabetes. A better understanding of these mechanisms may lead to less invasive endoscopic treatments of diabetes and obesity that may complement and widen current therapeutic options.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuejing Zheng ◽  
Qing Sang ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
Guanyang Chen ◽  
Yifan Guo ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 676-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih Kun Huang ◽  
Chi-Hsien Lo ◽  
Shabbir Asim ◽  
Jer-Yiing Houng ◽  
Shiou-Feng Huang

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1455
Author(s):  
Leonard K. Welsh ◽  
Gerardo Davalos ◽  
Ramon Diaz ◽  
Rafael Luengas ◽  
Dana Portenier ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Daniel Guerron ◽  
John H. Rodriguez ◽  
Matthew Kroh

Bariatric surgery has been proven to be safe and durable for treatment of obesity and obesity-related diseases. Although complication rates continue to decrease, complications occur and may impart significant morbidity. Treatment of complications often includes combinations of medical therapies and surgical or endoscopic interventions. Endoscopic techniques to treat complications of bariatric surgery have evolved, with improved tools and devices, as well as increased experience and expertise. Methods of dilation, hemostasis, suturing, clip placement, stenting, and feeding tube placement have given practitioners less-invasive ways to treat complications and also to provide durable enteral access. In patients with high reoperative complexity, endoscopic access may circumvent the abnormal pathology, with a less-invasive route. This chapter focuses on endoluminal management of common complications of bariatric surgery, including techniques employed and outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 3071-3075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Sweeny ◽  
Larry Buglino ◽  
Erika La Vella ◽  
Don Yarbrough

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-192
Author(s):  
Claudia Bures ◽  
Philippa Seika ◽  
Rossano Alvim Keppler Fiorelli ◽  
Dino Kröll ◽  
Ricardo Zorron

During upper gastrointestinal surgery, retraction of the liver plays an essential role in the visualization and creation of an optimal surgical field. Liver retraction may be problematic, particularly in obese patients. The use of conventional liver retractors requires additional skin incision and has the potential to cause pain as well as liver injuries. The present study is the first to evaluate the performance and safety of the LiVac Sling (Livac Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia) trocar-free retractor system in bariatric surgery patients. In this retrospective study, data from laparoscopic primary or revisional bariatric surgeries that were performed with the LiVac Sling system and a standard retractor between May 2017 and December 2017 were collected. Demographic data, body mass index, type of surgery, number and indication of LiVac Sling system used, surgery time, and complications were analyzed. In total, 51 procedures were included. Twenty Sling devices have been used in 17 patients (13 female; 75%). The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar between the standard retractor group and LiVac Sling retractor group. In the LiVac Sling group, the number of trocars used was significantly reduced over the study period. Within 30 days postoperatively, no complications could be identified, and no device-related adverse events were reported. In this bariatric population, the use of the LiVac Sling for liver retraction was safe. No device-related adverse events were registered, and compared with standard retraction, the number of trocars used could be reduced by one.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document