Bearing and uplift capacities of under-reamed piles in soft clay underlaid by stiff clay using lower-bound finite element limit analysis

Author(s):  
Mantu Majumder ◽  
Debarghya Chakraborty
2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 852-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
R S Merifield ◽  
S W Sloan

During the last 30 years various researchers have proposed approximate techniques to estimate the uplift capacity of soil anchors. As the majority of past research has been experimentally based, much current design practice is based on empiricism. Somewhat surprisingly, very few numerical analyses have been performed to determine the ultimate pullout loads of anchors. This paper presents the results of a rigorous numerical study to estimate the ultimate pullout load for vertical and horizontal plate anchors in frictional soils. Rigorous bounds have been obtained using two numerical procedures that are based on finite element formulations of the upper and lower bound theorems of limit analysis. For comparison purposes, numerical estimates of the break-out factor have also been obtained using the more conventional displacement finite element method. Results are presented in the familiar form of break-out factors based on various soil strength profiles and geometries and are compared with existing numerical and empirical solutions.Key words: anchor, pullout capacity, finite elements, limit analysis, lower bound, sand.


2000 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. D. Reinhardt ◽  
S. P. Mangalaramanan

Conventional analysis of tubesheets in nuclear steam generators involves elastic analysis of a solid plate with equivalent properties. It has recently been recognized that alternate design techniques such as inelastic finite element analysis would lead to substantial cost reductions in material and manufacturing. Due to the anisotropy, arriving at yield criteria for an equivalent solid tubesheet is more complicated than for an isotropic solid. In addition, applying plastic finite element analysis in design is significantly more complex and time-consuming than elastic analysis. This paper proposes a relatively simple method to perform tubesheet collapse analysis. An anisotropic yield criterion is applied in conjunction with the classical lower-bound theorem of limit analysis and repeated elastic analyses involving elastic modulus modification. Two yield criteria are examined, namely Hill’s yield criterion and a recently suggested compressible fourth-order yield function. The collapse load predictions of the lower-bound equivalent solid methods are compared with the elastic-plastic finite element collapse load of the equivalent solid and of the actual perforated tubesheet.


2022 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 106672
Author(s):  
Mads Emil Møller Andersen ◽  
Peter Noe Poulsen ◽  
John Forbes Olesen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document