scholarly journals Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Massaro ◽  
Andrea Moro ◽  
Ewald Aschauer ◽  
Matthias Fink
2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucio Biggiero

Self-organization is a property of social systems, and its recognition can give a remarkable contribution to the theory of entrepreneurship and to the analysis of inter-organizational networks. While literature on the classification of inter-firm networks and on their (dis)advantages is relatively abundant, there is much less on the processes of their formation and development. Since the convenience of building inter-firm networks is often uncertain and ambiguous, it involves social-psychological aspects and is based on personal relationships. This is particularly true in the case of small business networks, where the small firm size makes firm networks coincide with entrepreneurial networks. This characteristic can be extended to industrial districts, which are systems emerging from the interplay between small business networks. Industrial districts are weakly hierarchical organizations, which present the typical dual nature of social systems: the systemic nature, which is manifested more at the unity level, considering the district as a whole, and the subjective behavior of its members, which can play a crucial role either in triggering the district or in its evolutionary patterns. Such a double nature becomes a powerful engine of knowledge creation/transfer when organizations are recursive and self-organizing, and when the emerging values promote cooperation and trust. These co-evolutionary, recursive and self-organizing aspects have been synthesized in Nonaka's concept of ‘ba’. The cases discussed here deal with recursive processes in the formation of entrepreneurial networks in the biomedical district and in the formation of the district itself, which are seen as partially self-organizing processes. In the perspective considering knowledge as embodied in human beings and created by their social interactions, this paper concerns self-organizing and knowledge-creating processes at district and network levels.


1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-88
Author(s):  
Shaun Goldfinch ◽  
Martin Perry

Author(s):  
Cordelia Kunaka ◽  
Menisha N. Moos

Background: Mentoring as support for both the business and the individual entrepreneur or small business owner is important for the continued perseverance of the entrepreneurial journey.Aim: Different mentoring outcomes were evaluated to establish what is being gained from the mentoring relationships to encourage other entrepreneurs and small business owners to pursue mentoring relationships.Setting: South African entrepreneurs and small business owners who were currently being mentored or had been mentored.Method: The study used a survey research design that consisted of 209 qualifying entrepreneurs and small business owners. An online questionnaire was used to collect the data.Results: The results show that there is a relationship between the different mentoring outcomes (skills transfer outcomes, knowledge transfer outcomes, entrepreneur resilience outcomes and business outcomes). In addition, it was established that as the mentoring relationship goes through the different phases of initiation, cultivation, separation and redefinition, mentoring outcomes such as skills transfer and entrepreneur resilience are independently attained.Conclusion: Understanding the outcomes of mentoring will encourage more participation in the field of mentoring for South African mentors, entrepreneurs and small business owners through awareness of the benefits thereof as well as how mentoring can form a strong supporting mechanism. This research makes a theoretical contribution by naming and grouping mentoring outcomes into four categories, such as skills transfer outcomes, knowledge transfer outcomes, entrepreneur resilience outcomes and business outcomes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-334

‘Internet Review’ provides critical commentary on entrepreneurship, small business and innovation information on the Web.


Author(s):  
John Chiang

Multinational corporation (MNC) subsidiaries have become more closely linked to globalized business networks. The rapid technological changes are accelerating globalization, these changes have forced producers to constantly upgrade their process technologies, introduce new products and reduce costs to increase profits. Subsidiary performance is at the core of increased profits for MNCs. Accordingly, this research focuses upon subsidiary performance regarding three key contingencies that current international business literature deems likely to impact the bottom line: absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer and social capital. Unique data from more than 300 MNCs with locations in China, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan were collected and analyzed. Findings suggest that concentrating on these three factors in subsidiaries knowledge environment could improve MNCs overall performance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Wynn ◽  
Peter Jones

Entrepreneurship research has often focused on the capabilities and motivation of the entrepreneurs themselves, but there have also been more recent attempts to understand the contextual factors that can engender and support entrepreneurial activity. This article examines the contextual factors in evidence in four Knowledge Transfer Partnership case studies, where entrepreneurial activity has played a key role in developing and implementing significant change projects in small business enterprises. Based on a detailed analysis of these case studies, a number of contextual factors are identified that may act as a model for others researching entrepreneurship in similar contexts. The study finds that four main factors in the broader socio-economic environment were key in engendering entrepreneurial activity: the influence of the local university, availability of financial support, regional knowledge production and the presence of industry clusters pursuing similar objectives. There were also a number of influencing factors within the small business company environment: the potential to develop human and social capital, particularly evident in family businesses, and the opportunities to rapidly adopt and change technology platforms and systems that encouraged entrepreneurial thinking and initiative taking. The case studies also evidence that entrepreneurial initiatives may not always produce successful long-term outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document