Good Scientific Practice: Developing a Curriculum for Medical Students in Germany

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Fuerholzer ◽  
Maximilian Schochow ◽  
Florian Steger
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Scientific Practice ◽  
Good Scientific Practice

scholarly journals Quality Assessment for the Sustainable Provision of Software Components and Digital Research Infrastructures for the Arts and Humanities

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Buddenbohm ◽  
Markus Matoni ◽  
Stefan Schmunk ◽  
Carsten Thiel
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Digital Humanities ◽  
Scientific Practice ◽  
Software Components ◽  
Good Scientific Practice ◽  
Arts And Humanities ◽  
Research Publications ◽  
The Arts ◽  
Research Infrastructures ◽  
Digital Research

AbstractInfrastructure for facilitating access to and reuse of research publications and data is well established nowadays. However, such is not the case for software. In spite of documentation and reusability of software being recognised as good scientific practice, and a growing demand for them, the infrastructure and services necessary for software are still in their infancy. This paper explores how quality assessment may be utilised for evaluating the infrastructure for software, and to ascertain the effort required to archive software and make it available for future use. The paper focuses specifically on digital humanities and related ESFRI projects.

The 3Rs and Good Scientific Practice

2017 ◽  
pp. 41-67
Author(s):  
Helena Rocklinsberg ◽  
Mickey Gjerris ◽  
Anna Olsson
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Practice ◽  
Good Scientific Practice

Exploring unexplained variation

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Doherty ◽  
Kenneth M. Shemberg ◽  
Richard B. Anderson ◽  
Ryan D. Tweney
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Scientific Practice ◽  
Scientific Integrity ◽  
Scientific Psychology ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Compelling Argument ◽  
Good Scientific Practice ◽  
Many Sources ◽  
Richard Feynman ◽  
Unexplained Variation

In a 1974 commencement address, Richard Feynman described scientific integrity as a kind of utter honesty, a kind of leaning over backwards to tell the whole truth. We argue that investigators could tell more of the truth and increase the value of their papers by highlighting and discussing unexplained variation, a major source of which is individual differences. An argument that unexplained individual differences must have many sources is presented, and means of representing that variation are illustrated. We believe that such a change in reporting of research results is likely to advance the progress of scientific psychology, but perhaps the most compelling argument for what we propose is simply that telling the whole story as fully as possible is good scientific practice. The Appendix provides two examples of what we are urging, taken from recent psychological literature.

Commentary: Sperm Counts, Data Responsibility, and Good Scientific Practice

Epidemiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 620-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels E. Skakkebaek ◽  
Anna-Maria Andersson ◽  
Anders Juul ◽  
Tina Kold Jensen ◽  
Kristian Almstrup ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Practice ◽  
Good Scientific Practice ◽  
Sperm Counts

scholarly journals Code of ethics in science and research good scientific practice

2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ljiljana Vuckovic-Dekic ◽  
Sinisa Radulovic ◽  
Nevenka Stanojevic-Brkic ◽  
Svetislav Jelic ◽  
Nenad Borojevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Scientific Practice ◽  
Good Scientific Practice ◽  
Ethics In Science ◽  
Science And Research
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document