Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in metastases of papillary thyroid carcinoma

Endocrine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junhao Wu ◽  
Lei Ou ◽  
Chunyin Zhang
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. e403-e404
Author(s):  
Jae Pil Hwang ◽  
Seung-Won Lee ◽  
Jeong Ja Kwak ◽  
Jung Mi Park

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1306-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Woong Choi ◽  
Young Hoon Yoon ◽  
Yeo Hoon Yoon ◽  
Seong Min Kim ◽  
Bon Seok Koo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umut Elboğa ◽  
Zeynel Abidin Sayiner ◽  
Ertan Şahin ◽  
Saadettin Öztürk ◽  
Yusuf Burak Çayırlı ◽  
...  

Abstract Context: PET CT imaging methods based on fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs) have recently demonstrated promising clinical results. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the use of 68Ga-FAPI PET / CT and 18FDG PET / CT imaging techniques to detect the metastatic foci in recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma.Design and Patients: This is a prospective study. Patients who were diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma, achieved biochemical recovery after the first operation and having recurrence for papillary thyroid carcinoma on the follow up were included in the study. [68Ga] Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F] FDG PET / CT were performed for comparative purpose and detection of recurrence localization.Results: [18F] FDG PET / CT detected the metastatic foci in 21 of 29 patients (72.4%), [68Ga] Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 was able to detect the metastatic foci in 25 of 29 patients (86.2%). When the two imaging techniques were used together, the metastatic foci in 27 of the 29 patients could be detected (93.1%.). Also between the [18F] FDG PET / CT SUVmax values and [68Ga] Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 SUVmax values, a statistical significance was found in favor of 68Ga-FAPI PET (p = 0,002).Conclusion: In conclusion, 68Ga-FAPI PET imaging technique can be used as an alternative method to detect the metastatic focus or foci in patients with recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma. It can also increase the chance of metastatic focus or foci detection when used in conjunction with the 18 FDG PET.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 787-793
Author(s):  
Chang-Hee Lee ◽  
Sang-Woo Lee ◽  
Seung Hyun Son ◽  
Chae Moon Hong ◽  
Ju Hye Jeong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document