The 2010 WHO Classification of Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: a Critical Appraisal four years after Its Introduction

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Rindi ◽  
G. Petrone ◽  
F. Inzani
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 600-605
Author(s):  
Ivan Peregorodiev ◽  
Vagan Bokhian ◽  
Vera Delektorskaya ◽  
Anna Safonova

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the stomach include a heterogeneous group of neoplasms characterized by different pathogenetic mechanisms, metastatic potential, and prognosis. The incidence of gastric NAN has increased 15-fold over the past few decades. It is necessary to clearly distinguish between well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NETs) of the stomach and neuroendocrine cancer (NECs) of the stomach, as well as mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. To date, there are three classifications that are used in clinical practice: clinicopathological classification, WHO classification, and UICC TNM classification. It should be noted that over the past five years, these classifications have undergone important changes. In the clinicopathological classification, in addition to the existing three types, a number of authors proposed to add the 4th type (developing as a result of inadequate functioning of the proton pump) and the 5th type (developing in patients who receive long-term therapy with proton pump inhibitors). In the 2019 WHO classification, an important change is the acceptance that well-differentiated NETs can have a high degree of malignancy – Grade III. The main changes in the 8th edition of the TNM classification concerned the differentiation of the M symbol. Thus, to date, the classification of gastric NENs allows us to accurately characterize tumor staging, the pathogenesis underlying their development, and prognosis. They form the basis for choosing an adequate treatment strategy that makes possible to achieve the most favourable result.


Pathology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. S57
Author(s):  
Z.-L. Chow ◽  
V.A. White ◽  
B.I. Indave ◽  
D. Lokuhetty ◽  
I.A. Cree

Author(s):  
Keisuke Miyake ◽  
Kenta Suzuki ◽  
Tomoya B Ogawa ◽  
Daisuke Ogawa ◽  
Tetsuhiro Hatakeyama ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The molecular diagnosis of gliomas such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status (wild-type [wt] or mutation [mut]) is especially important in the 2016 WHO classification. Positron emission tomography (PET) has afforded molecular and metabolic diagnostic imaging. The present study aimed to define the interrelationship between the 2016 WHO classification of gliomas and the integrated data from PET images using multiple tracers, including 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18F-FDG), 11C-methionine ( 11C-MET), 18F-fluorothymidine ( 18F-FLT), and 18F-fluoromisonidazole ( 18F-FMISO). Methods This retrospective, single-center study comprised 113 patients with newly diagnosed glioma based on the 2016 WHO criteria. Patients were divided into four glioma subtypes (Mut, Codel, Wt, and glioblastoma multiforme [GBM]). Tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) divided by mean normal cortical SUV (tumor-normal tissue ratio [TNR]) was calculated for 18F-FDG, 11C-MET, and 18F-FLT. Tumor-blood SUV ratio (TBR) was calculated for 18F-FMISO. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of PET tracers in distinguishing glioma subtypes, a comparative analysis of TNRs and TBR as well as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were calculated by Scheffe’s multiple comparison procedure for each PET tracer following the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results The differences in mean 18F-FLT TNR and 18F-FMISO TBR were significant between GBM and other glioma subtypes (p < 0.001). Regarding the comparison between Gd-T1WI volumes and 18F-FLT MTVs or 18F-FMISO MTVs, we identified significant differences between Wt and Mut or Codel (p < 0.01). Conclusion Combined administration of four PET tracers might aid in the preoperative differential diagnosis of gliomas according to the 2016 WHO criteria.


Author(s):  
Elisabeth J. Rushing

SummaryIdentification of the underlying genetic and epigenetic alterations in an increasing number of tumors of the nervous system is contributing to a more clinically relevant classification. In the following article, the 7 cIMPACT-NOW publications, which adumbrate the upcoming 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous Sytem are summarized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document