Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP NENs) : The Role of Checkpoint Inhibitors

Background: The treatment options for GEP-NENs includes various drugs and is based on grading, morphology and location of the primary Objective: The aim of our work is to investigate the clinical impact of new immune checkpoint inhibitors in order to define a new possible strategy of use within GEP-NENs. Method: A scientific literature search from 2015 to January 2020 was performed by using PubMed and Embase: reviews and prospective or retrospective studies with a minimum of twenty patients were selected; conference proceedings were included Results: several studies have been conducted to assess the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NENs, but nowadays the current knowledge in this field is mainly based on a phase I-II studies. Immunotherapy showed limited antitumor activity, but higher response rate was reported in poor-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. No specific biomarkers were identified for patient selection and response assessment Conclusion: Immunotherapy appears as a powerful possibility to help our patients, but nowadays we see many gaps in this field. We must balance therapeutic possibility offered by precision oncology with the understanding the limitations of application of testing and treatment in clinical practice. Future efforts should focus on research of the best patients to candidate for immunotherapy in term of disease characteristics and previous treatments, and how to select them with accurate biomarkers.

Toripalimab: the First Domestic Anti-Tumor PD-1 Antibody in China

Toripalimab (Tuoyi™) is a selective, recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) developed by Shanghai Junshi Bioscience Co., Ltd. Toripalimab is able to bind to PD-1 and block the interaction with its ligands. The binding of toripalimab to PD-1 is mainly attributed to the heavy chain of the former and the FG loop of the latter. Toripalimab received a conditional approval in China for the treatment of melanoma (second-line) in December, 2018. It has also received approvals to treat nasopharyngeal carcinoma (first-line and third-line) and urothelial carcinoma (second-line) in 2021. Additionally, several orphan drug designations were granted to toripalimab by the US Food and Drug Administration. Toripalimab has exhibited primary anti-tumor effects in tumors such as melanoma, lung cancer, digestive tract tumors, hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors, neuroendocrine neoplasms, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. It showed a satisfactory anti-tumor effect and long-term survival benefits in Chinese melanoma patients, while the combination of axitinib with toripalimab exhibited an impressive result in metastatic mucosal melanoma. As a checkpoint inhibitor, toripalimab was generally well-tolerated in the enrolled patients. Due to different study populations, comparisons could not be made directly between toripalimab and other drugs in most cases. Nevertheless, the introduction of toripalimab may offer a valuable choice for decision-making in the treatment of tumors in the future.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Breast:A Rare Breast Tumor Worthy of Attention

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms of breast(NENB) is a rare and underrecognized subtype of breast neoplasms.The clinical significance, prognostic risk factors and optimal treatment modalities are limited. This study was focused on clinical and pathological features of 27 NENB cases to improve the understanding of these diseases and to further investigate the behavior of these neoplasms and to provide more factual evidence.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features and follow-up data of 27 patients diagnosed with NENB at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College between February 2003 and February 2015.Results: The proportion of NENB from all invasive breast carcinomas(BC) in our hospital was 0.24% (27/11352). The expression of specific immunohistochemical markers was different: 48.1% cases showed the expression of chromogranin A (CgA)(13/27), CD56 was positive in 77.8%cases (21/27), the positive rate of INSM1 and synaptophysin (Syn) were 85.2%（23/27）and 100.0% (27/27). NENB occurred in older patients (median age,64 ).11cases (40.7%) were well-differentiated NETs and 16 cases (59.3%) were poorly differentiated NEC. In NETs, The positive rate of ER was 10/11 (90.9%) , while in NECs, The positive rate of ER was 9/16(56.3%) , On the basis of immunophenotypes, most of NENBs were of the luminal molecular subtype ,6 cases were luminal A and 15cases were luminal B ,6 cases were triple negative breast cancer(TNBC) and had no HER-2 overexpression subtypes. Conclusions: NENB more likely occures in elderly patients.Well-differentiated NETs are more often positive for hormone receptors than poorly differentiated NEC. NENBs are almost negative for HER-2. The combination of INSM1 is an effective supplement and improvement for traditional neuroendocrine markers.

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Extrahepatic Biliary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in the Gallbladder, Extrahepatic Biliary Tract, and Ampulla of Vater: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study

BackgroundSignificant changes were made in the grading and staging systems for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in 2017. Therefore, a clinical report to comprehensively update the clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic approaches, and prognosis of these patients should be drafted.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a database of 16 patients who developed NENs or mixed endocrine non-endocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) after curative resection. Among them, eight had ampulla of Vater (AoV) tumors, and eight had non-AoV tumors. One patient had NEN Grade 1, five had NEN Grade 2, and five had NEN Grade 3 (G3); all had poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Five patients had MiNEN or combined carcinoma.ResultsThe mean age was 57.88 years. The overall survival rates after curative surgery at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87.1, 80.4, and 71.4%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87.1%, 79.8%, and 71.8%, respectively. In univariate analysis, age >65 years, mitotic count (>20/10 high-power fields), Ki-67 index >20%, and presence of stones were significant prognosticators, whereas only the mitotic count was statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. Age >65 years (p=0.039), a Ki-67 index >20% (p=0.03), presence of stones (p=0.021), G3 stage disease, MiNEN (p=0.002), or perineural invasion (p<0.001) were more frequently observed in the non-AoV group than in the AoV group.ConclusionHigh mitosis count had a greater effect on extrahepatic biliary NEN than the tumor-node-metastasis staging system. Patients with AoV tumors had better prognostic predictor factors compared to those with non-AoV tumors.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: The Latest WHO Classification and Review of the Literature

Breast tumors with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation comprise an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumors, including invasive breast cancer of no special type (IBC-NST) with NE features, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 2019 defined neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast (Br-NENs) as tumors in which >90% of cells show histological evidence of NE differentiation, including NETs (low-grade tumors) and NEC (high-grade). Due to the low prevalence of these tumors and successive changes in their diagnostic criteria over the years, only limited evidence of these tumors exists, derived mainly from case reports and retrospective case series. Breast tumors with NE differentiation are usually treated like the more commonly occurring IBC-NSTs. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of breast tumors with NE differentiation usually shows a hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor type 2 (HER2)-negative profile, so that hormonal therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors or other targeted agents would be reasonable treatment options. Herein, we present a review of the literature on breast tumors with NE differentiation as defined in the latest WHO 2019 classification, and discuss the clinical management of these tumors.