Spontaneous Subdural Fluid Collection Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Subdural Hygroma or External Hydrocephalus?

Object. The authors sought to investigate the mechanisms and pathophysiological effects of subdural fluid collection after surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Methods. The authors retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 76 patients who had undergone craniotomy. The patients included 55 with aneurysmal SAH (SAH group) and 21 with unruptured aneurysms (non-SAH group) who were used as controls. Subdural fluid collection was more common in the SAH than in the non-SAH group (38% compared with 14%, p < 0.05). Although older patients appeared to be at greater risk for subdural fluid collection in both groups (p < 0.05), this condition developed even in relatively young patients with SAH. In the SAH group most subdural fluid collection was associated with ventricular dilation (81%), and a significant correlation was seen between fluid collection and the need for subsequent shunt placement (48% compared with 21%, p < 0.05). These results point to an association between hydrodynamic dysfunction and subdural fluid collection. The course of patients with subdural fluid collection varied from spontaneous resolution to normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Seven patients with persistent subdural collections underwent shunt placement (ventriculoperitoneal [VP] shunt in six and lumboperitoneal in one), which resulted in resolution of fluid collection in all seven. Conclusions. The results indicate that for most patients in the SAH group, subdural fluid collection represented “external hydrocephalus” rather than simple “subdural hygroma.” Decreased absorption of cerebrospinal fluid because of SAH and surgically created tears in the arachnoid membrane communicating with the subdural space were factors in the development of external hydrocephalus. The authors believe that differentiating external hydrocephalus from subdural hygroma is extremely important, because VP shunt placement can be used to treat the former but could worsen the latter.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma

Journal of Neurosurgery ◽

10.3171/jns.2006.105.1.65 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 105 (1) ◽

pp. 65-70 ◽

Cited By ~ 34

Author(s):

Pil-Woo Huh ◽

Do-Sung Yoo ◽

Kyung-Suok Cho ◽

Chun-Kun Park ◽

Seok-Gu Kang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Head Trauma ◽

Diagnostic Method ◽

Obstructive Hydrocephalus ◽

Fluid Collection ◽

Subdural Effusion ◽

Subdural Fluid Collection ◽

Subdural Hygroma ◽

Subdural Collection ◽

External Hydrocephalus ◽

Frontal Horn

Object The various terms used to describe subdural fluid collection—“external hydrocephalus,” “subdural hygroma,” “subdural effusion,” “benign subdural collection,” and “extraventricular obstructive hydrocephalus”—reflect the confusion surrounding the diagnoses of these diseases. Differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma may be difficult, but the former appears to be a distinct clinical entity separate from the latter. In this report, the authors present a diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma, based on their clinical experience in treating subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma. Methods Twenty patients with subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma were included in this study. Ventricle size was measured using a modified frontal horn index (mFHI); that is, the largest width of the frontal horns divided by the bicortical distance in the same plane, instead of the inner table distance. Bur hole trephination was performed on the appearance of a subdural fluid collection thicker than 15 mm on computed tomography (CT), persistent (longer than 4 weeks) or increasing in size, and accompanied by neurological symptoms (confusion or memory impairment). During the procedure, subdural pressure was measured using a manometer before opening the dura mater. Subdural pressure varied among the patients, ranging from 3 to 27.5 cm H2O. Four patients with a subdural pressure greater than 15 cm H2O had hydrocephalus after surgery (p < 0.05). Hydrocephalus developed in a pediatric patient (2 years old) with a subdural pressure of 12 cm H2O. All of the patients in whom hydrocephalus developed after bur hole trephination had had enlarged ventricles (mFHI > 33%) on preoperative CT scans. Conclusions Monitoring subdural pressure may be a valuable tool for differentiating subdural hygroma from external hydrocephalus in patients with mild head trauma. Additionally, the mFHI reflects the nature of the subdural collection more accurately than the standard frontal horn index.

Download Full-text