Therapeutic efficacy evaluation of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in mid-thoracic esophageal carcinoma patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yu ◽  
Zhou Wang ◽  
Zhe Yang ◽  
Xiang-Yan Liu
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

Comparison of Outcomes following Transhiatal or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Gluch ◽  
Ross C. Smith ◽  
Christopher P. Bambach ◽  
Alastair R. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Merritt ◽  
Peter J. Kneuertz ◽  
Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul ◽  
Desmond M. D’Souza ◽  
Kyle A. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

Abstract Background Locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy (trimodality therapy). We compared the long-term oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (M-ILE) cohort with a propensity score weighted cohort of open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (O-ILE) cases after trimodality therapy. Methods This is a retrospective review of 223 patients diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by M-ILE or O-ILE from April 2009 to February 2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment was used to balance the baseline characteristics between study groups. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated for overall survival and recurrence-free survival comparing the two groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine predictive variables for overall and recurrence-free survival. Results The IPTW cohort included patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent M-ILE (n = 142) or O-ILE (n = 68). The overall rate of postoperative adverse events was not significantly different after IPTW adjustment between the O-ILE and M-ILE trimodality groups (53.4% vs. 39.2%, p = 0.089). The 3-year overall survival (OS) for the M-ILE group was 59.4% (95% CI: 49.8–67.8) compared to 55.7% (95% CI: 39.2–69.4) for the O-ILE group (p = 0.670). The 3-year recurrence-free survival for the M-ILE group was 59.9% (95% CI: 50.2–68.2) compared to 61.6% (95% CI: 41.9–76.3) for the O-ILE group (p = 0.357). A complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation was significantly predictive of improved OS and RFS. Conclusion The overall and recurrence-free survival rates for M-ILE were not significantly different from O-ILE for esophageal carcinoma after trimodality therapy. Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation was predictive of improved overall and recurrence- free survival.

scholarly journals Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy versus one-incision esophagectomy via the left thoracic approach in the treatment of middle and lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (33) ◽  
pp. 3710
Author(s):  
Guo-Qing Lu ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
Ainiwaer·Julaiti ◽  
De-Sheng Li ◽  
Xiaheding·Yiliyaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
Thoracic Approach

Indocyanine green perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keouna Pather ◽  
Adeline M. Deladisma ◽  
Christina Guerrier ◽  
Isaac R. Kriley ◽  
Ziad T. Awad
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Indocyanine Green ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
Perfusion Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document