Management of radiation therapy-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Part I: Clinical significance, pathophysiology and prevention

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Cheong Ngeow ◽  
Wen Lin Chai ◽  
Rosnah Binti Zain
2011 ◽  
pp. 102-113
Author(s):  
Wei Cheong Ngeow ◽  
Wen Lin Chai ◽  
Rosnah Binti Zain

Oropharyngeal mucositis is the acute inflammatory and ulcerative reaction of the oral mucosa following radiation therapy to the head and neck region. It is such a common problem that nearly all head and neck cancer patients develop some degree of mucositis. This complication is usually transient in nature but it also represents an important clinical problem as it is a painful, debilitating, dose-dependent side effect for which there is no widely acceptable prophylaxis or effective treatment. As several authoritative groups have recently either undertaken systematic reviews or issued guidelines on the management of mucositis, it is the aim of this review to provide instead an overview of all the possible remedies available, as well as highlighting to researchers the gaps that need to be filled. The first part of this review outlines the clinical significance and pathophysiology of radiation-induced mucositis, and looks into some of the preventive approaches available.


2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. S781-S782
Author(s):  
P. Widlak ◽  
K. Jelonek ◽  
M. Ros ◽  
M. Pietrowska ◽  
T. Rutkowski ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. E326-E327
Author(s):  
D.J. Carpenter ◽  
G. Broadwater ◽  
Y.M. Mowery ◽  
A. Rodrigues ◽  
A.J. Wisdom ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Feng Teng ◽  
Wenjun Fan ◽  
Yanrong Luo ◽  
Zhongjian Ju ◽  
Hanshun Gong ◽  
...  

Objective. This study aimed to analyze the effects of comprehensive protection of bilateral parotid glands (PG-T), contralateral submandibular gland (cSMG), and accessory salivary glands in the oral cavity (OC) by helical tomotherapy for head-and-neck cancer patients. Methods. Totally 175 patients with histologically confirmed head-and-neck cancer treated with helical tomotherapy were recruited. The doses delivered to PG-T, cSMG, and OC were constrained to be as low as possible in treatment planning. The saliva flow rates and xerostomia questionnaire were evaluated. Correlation between xerostomia and other clinical factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate models. The impact of salivary gland dose on locoregional (LR) recurrence was assessed by Cox analysis. ROC curve was used to determine the threshold of mean dose for each gland. Results. The median follow-up was 25 (19–36) months. The OC mean dose, PG-T mean dose, cSMG mean dose, age, clinical stage (II and III versus IV), and both unstimulated and stimulated saliva flow rates were significantly correlated with xerostomia. The OC mean dose, cSMG mean dose, age, and clinical stage were predictors of xerostomia after adjusting PG-T mean dose, and unstimulated and stimulated saliva flow rates. Xerostomia was significantly decreased when the mean doses of PG-T, cSMG, and OC were kept below 29.12Gy, 29.29Gy, and 31.44Gy, respectively. At 18 months after radiation therapy, early LR recurrence rate was only 4%. Conclusion. Comprehensive protection of salivary glands minimized xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients treated by helical tomotherapy, without increasing early LR recurrence risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document