Numerical and experimental approach to reduce bouncing effect in electromagnetic forming process using cushion plate

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 3263-3271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hak-Gon Noh ◽  
Woo-Jin Song ◽  
Beom-Soo Kang ◽  
Jeong Kim
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 140-151
Author(s):  
Quanliang Cao ◽  
Xian Li ◽  
Zhenhao Li ◽  
Limeng Du ◽  
Liangyu Xia ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 2809-2815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Min Tak ◽  
Han-Bin Kang ◽  
In-Seok Baek ◽  
Seok-Soon Lee

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 171-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiren Xiong ◽  
Wenping Wang ◽  
Min Wan ◽  
Xinjun Li

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong-Chan Heo ◽  
Young-Ho Seo ◽  
Tae-Wan Ku ◽  
Beom-Soo Kang

1999 ◽  
Vol 601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn S. Daehn ◽  
Vincent J. Vohnout ◽  
Subrangshu Datta

AbstractThis paper has two distinct goals. First, we argue in an extended introduction that high velocity forming, as can be implemented through electromagnetic forming, is a technology that should be developed. As a process used in conjunction with traditional stamping, it may offer dramatically improved formability, reduced wrinkling and active control of springback among other advantages. In the body of the paper we describe the important factors that lead to improved formability at high velocity. In particular, high sample velocity can inhibit neck growth. There is a sample size dependence where larger samples have better ductility than those of smaller dimensions. These aspects are at least partially described by the recent model of Freund and Shenoy. In addition to this, boundary conditions imposed by sample launch and die impact can have important effects on formability.


2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (12) ◽  
pp. 124907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da Xu ◽  
Xuesong Liu ◽  
Kun Fang ◽  
Hongyuan Fang

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 520-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhiraj Gayakwad ◽  
Mahesh Kumar Dargar ◽  
Pramod Kumar Sharma ◽  
Rajesh purohit ◽  
R.S. Rana

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document