Comparison of Results of Dual Mesh Hernioplasty and Omental Interposition Polypropylene Mesh Hernioplasty in Incisional Hernias

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 646-650
Author(s):  
Gurcan Simsek ◽  
Ahmet Tekin ◽  
Adil Kartal
Author(s):  
Jaime Rodriguez San Pio ◽  
Tine Engberg Damsgaard ◽  
Ole Momsen ◽  
Villadsen Ivan ◽  
Jørn Larsen

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Manuel Vilar ◽  
Franscisco Doreste ◽  
Giuseppe Spinella ◽  
Simona Valentini

2021 ◽  
pp. 36-38
Author(s):  
Ankur Akela ◽  
Prashant Kumar Singh

Morgagni hernia occurs after a congenital retrosternal diaphragmatic defect; it is a rare form of diaphragmatic hernia (1-3% of cases). In general, this pathology is diagnosed in children; in adults it is frequently discovered in emergency or incidentally. Methods: We prospectively evaluated a series of 6 patients admitted to department of surgery IGIMS. Results: Out of 6 patients the laparoscopic approach was used in all cases: one conversion was recorded due to the tight adherences of the herniated viscera (gastric, colon, epiplon). In 4 cases, the surgical cure of hernia was performed by suture and in 2 cases with prosthesis: dual mesh in one case and polypropylene mesh in another case. We did not register morbidity and the mean postoperative stay was 4 days (range 2-6 days). Conclusions: Hernia Morgagni betrays a rare pathology. The most common is asymptomatic but in complicated cases it is a cause of acute surgical abdomen. Surgical treatment is indicated even for asymptomatic cases due to serious complications Morgagni hernia may develop. The laparoscopic approach is ideal, as reduction of viscera in the abdomen is easy and the defect will be repaired by suturing or using a prosthesis, depending on its size.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Yildirim ◽  
Omer Engin ◽  
Mehmet Karademir ◽  
Abdurrahman Hoser ◽  
Bulent Calik

2009 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-53
Author(s):  
Iqbal Saleem ◽  
Anjum Malik

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 360-365
Author(s):  
FAKHAR ILYAS MALIK ◽  
TAHIR IQBAL MIRZA

Background: Incisional hernia is a common surgical condition with a reported incidence of 2-11% following laparotomy. Various Modalities of Repair have been advocated but the overall results still remain disappointing. Objective: To evaluate in incisional Hernias the efficacy and safety of Intraperitoneal mesh repair with conventional Polypropylene Mesh. Setting: In CMH Muzaffarabad, CMH Sialkot and PAC Hospital Kamra. Period: From January 2000 to January 2007. Materials & Methods: 90 cases of Incisional hernia with a minimal defect size of 4 inches were included; there was no limitation to age and sex. Patients with Co morbid conditions like Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Bronchial Asthma, and Ischemic Heart Disease etc: were also included if there was no other contraindications for Surgery. Observations were made with regard to duration and ease of the operation, wound complications, hospital stay, recurrence and delayed complications. Results: In our series of 90 patients, Females (92.22%, n= 83) outnumbered males (7.77%, n=7) and the highest incidence was in the 4th decade of life in females and the 3rd decade of life in males. Gynecological operations accounted for 61.44% (n=51) of the index operations. 77.7% (n=70) ofpatients had a BMI >30. Co morbid Conditions were present in 36.66% (n=33) of patients. The polypropylene mesh placed Intra peritoneal varied from 15×7.5 cm to 30×20 cm. The mean operating time was 60±20 minutes; operating time was extended when the procedure was accompanied by Dermolipectomy 80±10 minutes. 85.55% patients (n=77) attended our follow-up, ranging from 12 months to five years.Method of follow-up in outpatients department (OPD)/Clinics: 71.11%(n=64), by telephonic conversation: 12.22%(n=11). 14.44% (n=13) were lost in follow up. All patients in followup had serial abdominal sonograms at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively respectively to evaluate bowel motility, adhesion formation and any locally associated complication. No recurrence was noted in the follow-up group. Conclusions:Historically intraperitoneal Mesh placement of conventional polypropylene has been avoided as it was associated with significant postoperative complications. Based on our analysis, we believe that intraperitoneal mesh repair is still an effective option for Incisional hernias, especially in difficult cases and with patients having co morbid conditions. The associated high incidence of complications associated with intraperitoneal mesh placement in the literature were not seen in our experience.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 3994
Author(s):  
Uma Dhanasekaran ◽  
Ramesh Arumugam

Background: Incisional hernia is a common surgical condition encountered in day to day practice. Based on national operative statistics, incisional hernias account for 15 to 20% of all abdominal wall hernias. Of all hernias encountered incisional hernias can be the most frustrating and challenging to treat. This prospective study aims to assess the efficacy of preperitoneal mesh repair technique using polypropylene mesh in the management of incisional hernia.Methods: A total of 40 patients with incisional hernia undergone open preperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair. It had evaluated for post-operative complications and recurrence for six months to one-year post-surgery. The results had tabulated statistically analysed and compared with other published reports in the literature.Results: Out of 40 patients, the size of the defect, 10 patients had less than 2 cm, 28 patients had between 2.1-4 cm, 1 patient between 4.1-6 cm and 1 patient between 6.1-8 cm. The type of hernia, 32 patients had infra umbilical hernia, and 8 patients had a supraumbilical hernia. Post-operative complication 3 patients had seroma, 1 patient had edge necrosis, 1 patient had post-op ileus, and 1 patient had chronic pain. Based on follow up, 4 patients had followed until 6 months, 10 patients till 9 months and 26 patients till one year.Conclusions: Post-operative complications following open preperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair are considerably less compared to other techniques of mesh repair and showed no recurrence among its subjects during the follow-up period, and longer follow-up is required to draw a definitive conclusion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e55310313727
Author(s):  
Mirlam de Oliveira Sampaio Júnior ◽  
Ana Karoline Rodrigues da Costa ◽  
Danilo Rocha de Melo ◽  
Marcos Wilker da Conceição Santos ◽  
Jéssica Fontes Veloso ◽  
...  

The occurrence of incisional hernias in pigs is poorly described, so the objective of the study is to report a case of incisional hernia in pig treated with polypropylene mesh. A 1 year old male, mixed breed pig weighing 22 kg was treated at the HVU-UFOB. During the anamnesis, the owner reported that the animal had swelling in the abdominal region, having a suggestive diagnosis of umbilical hernia, confirmed by ultrasound. In view of the findings, it was decided to perform herniorrhaphy with direct suture. Ten days after surgery, adequate healing of the surgical wound was verified with the absence of a hernial ring. Fifty-one after surgery, the animal returned with an increase in abdominal volume at the surgery site. On physical examination, the presence of a 12 cm ring and reducible intestinal loops in the hernial sac were identified. After a new ultrasound examination, the diagnosis of incisional hernia was defined. A new herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh was chosen. After 10 days, the wound healing was verified. Incisional hernias in pigs are generally related to the animal's age, sex, breed and species, as well as flaws in the surgical technique. Biological or synthetic materials are used for the correction, in order to reinforce safety in the incision line. One year after herniorrhaphy, there was no recurrence, which shows a satisfactory result with the use of the polypropylene mesh.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document