scholarly journals Preperitoneal mesh repair in incisional hernia: a prospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 3994
Author(s):  
Uma Dhanasekaran ◽  
Ramesh Arumugam
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Polypropylene Mesh ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Background: Incisional hernia is a common surgical condition encountered in day to day practice. Based on national operative statistics, incisional hernias account for 15 to 20% of all abdominal wall hernias. Of all hernias encountered incisional hernias can be the most frustrating and challenging to treat. This prospective study aims to assess the efficacy of preperitoneal mesh repair technique using polypropylene mesh in the management of incisional hernia.Methods: A total of 40 patients with incisional hernia undergone open preperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair. It had evaluated for post-operative complications and recurrence for six months to one-year post-surgery. The results had tabulated statistically analysed and compared with other published reports in the literature.Results: Out of 40 patients, the size of the defect, 10 patients had less than 2 cm, 28 patients had between 2.1-4 cm, 1 patient between 4.1-6 cm and 1 patient between 6.1-8 cm. The type of hernia, 32 patients had infra umbilical hernia, and 8 patients had a supraumbilical hernia. Post-operative complication 3 patients had seroma, 1 patient had edge necrosis, 1 patient had post-op ileus, and 1 patient had chronic pain. Based on follow up, 4 patients had followed until 6 months, 10 patients till 9 months and 26 patients till one year.Conclusions: Post-operative complications following open preperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair are considerably less compared to other techniques of mesh repair and showed no recurrence among its subjects during the follow-up period, and longer follow-up is required to draw a definitive conclusion.

Using Prophylactic Prolene Mesh to Reduce the Incidence of Incisional Hernia at the Site of Stoma Closure

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Sayed Tantawy ◽  
Mohamed Mahfouz Mohamed ◽  
Ahmed Yasser Abdel Halim ◽  
Mostafa Mohamed Abdel Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Stoma Closure ◽  
Prolene Mesh ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Stoma Site ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Incisional hernias at stoma sites are not an infrequent problem, occurring in up to 30% of cases and it also varied in a range of studies from 0-48%. Objectives This is a prospective study to detect the feasibility of application of prolene mesh at the site of stoma closure in reducing the rate of post stomal incisional. INTRODUCTION Abdominal wall hernias are common and are a significant cause of morbidity. Stomas are commonly constructed following colorectal surgery to protect distal anastomosis or when sepsis prevents primary anastomosis. There is a risk of a wide range of morbidity following both stoma formation and stoma reversal (Chow et al., 2009). Incisional hernias at stoma sites are not an infrequent problem, occurring in up to 30% of cases and it also varied in a range of studies from 0-48% (Tilney et al., 2008). They occur over time and are generally under-reported, which may be due to the elderly nature of the population, the significant co-morbidities or early discharge from follow-up (Cingi et al., 2006). One in three patients may develop a hernia after stoma closure, and around half of hernias that are detected require repair.Risk of hernia is greater after colostomy closure than after ileostomy closure(Bhangu et al., 2012). A meta-analysis published in 2012 investigated the incidence of incisional hernia following closure of stoma, The overall mean incisional hernia rate following stoma closures was 7.4%. The authors reported a lower risk of hernia following reversal of ileostomy when compared to respectively (Bhangu et al., 2012). A further systematic review found a similar incidence for stoma site incisional hernias to be 8.3% (0–33.9%) (Nguyen et al., 2014). Two factors should be noted with regard to the incidence of stoma site hernia. Firstly, that the long-term risk is not known and secondly, that clinical examination alone is shown to have a lower detection rate of incisional hernia post stoma closure when compared to clinical imaging (Bhangu et al., 2012; Cingi et al., 2006). Therefore, studies focusing on only clinical examination may be underestimating the prevalence, as radiological detected herniae may become symptomatic over time and may be missed in studies with a short follow-up period. AIM OF THE WORK This is a prospective study to detect the feasibility of application of prolene mesh at the site of stoma closure in reducing the rate of post stomal incisional.

scholarly journals INTRAPERITONEAL MESH PLASTY

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 360-365
Author(s):  
FAKHAR ILYAS MALIK ◽  
TAHIR IQBAL MIRZA
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Polypropylene Mesh ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Mesh Placement ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Intraperitoneal Mesh ◽  
Intraperitoneal Mesh Placement ◽  
Morbid Conditions

Background: Incisional hernia is a common surgical condition with a reported incidence of 2-11% following laparotomy. Various Modalities of Repair have been advocated but the overall results still remain disappointing. Objective: To evaluate in incisional Hernias the efficacy and safety of Intraperitoneal mesh repair with conventional Polypropylene Mesh. Setting: In CMH Muzaffarabad, CMH Sialkot and PAC Hospital Kamra. Period: From January 2000 to January 2007. Materials & Methods: 90 cases of Incisional hernia with a minimal defect size of 4 inches were included; there was no limitation to age and sex. Patients with Co morbid conditions like Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Bronchial Asthma, and Ischemic Heart Disease etc: were also included if there was no other contraindications for Surgery. Observations were made with regard to duration and ease of the operation, wound complications, hospital stay, recurrence and delayed complications. Results: In our series of 90 patients, Females (92.22%, n= 83) outnumbered males (7.77%, n=7) and the highest incidence was in the 4th decade of life in females and the 3rd decade of life in males. Gynecological operations accounted for 61.44% (n=51) of the index operations. 77.7% (n=70) ofpatients had a BMI >30. Co morbid Conditions were present in 36.66% (n=33) of patients. The polypropylene mesh placed Intra peritoneal varied from 15×7.5 cm to 30×20 cm. The mean operating time was 60±20 minutes; operating time was extended when the procedure was accompanied by Dermolipectomy 80±10 minutes. 85.55% patients (n=77) attended our follow-up, ranging from 12 months to five years.Method of follow-up in outpatients department (OPD)/Clinics: 71.11%(n=64), by telephonic conversation: 12.22%(n=11). 14.44% (n=13) were lost in follow up. All patients in followup had serial abdominal sonograms at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively respectively to evaluate bowel motility, adhesion formation and any locally associated complication. No recurrence was noted in the follow-up group. Conclusions:Historically intraperitoneal Mesh placement of conventional polypropylene has been avoided as it was associated with significant postoperative complications. Based on our analysis, we believe that intraperitoneal mesh repair is still an effective option for Incisional hernias, especially in difficult cases and with patients having co morbid conditions. The associated high incidence of complications associated with intraperitoneal mesh placement in the literature were not seen in our experience.

scholarly journals Retromuscular prefascial mesh placement versus onlay mesh placement in the repair of incisional hernias: a prospective study

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Ranganath M. Venkatarangaiah ◽  
Darshan A. Manjunath ◽  
Amarnath V. Mudda ◽  
Veerabhadra Radhakrishna
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Mesh Placement ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: An incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal surgery with an incidence rate of two to 11%. Although there are various techniques described, the mesh repair has been the gold standard in the elective management of incisional hernias. But the best method of mesh placement is still debatable. Hence a study was conducted to compare the Retromuscular prefascial mesh placement with Onlay mesh placement in the treatment of incisional hernias.Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery in a tertiary center from November 2010 to May 2012. All patients with an incisional hernia underwent either Retromuscular prefascial mesh repair or onlay mesh repair. The nature of the previous surgery, size of the defect, operative, and postoperative complications were recorded. Mann Whitney test and Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the significance of the difference. A ‘p’ value <0.05 was considered significant.Results: A total of 60 patients were studied with 30 patients each in the Retromuscular prefascial group and the onlay group. Forty (67%) cases of incisional hernia were secondary to lower midline incision and hysterectomy was the most common surgery [30 patients (50%)]. The Retromuscular prefascial mesh group had significantly lesser postoperative complications (2/30 vs. 12/30; p=0.002; Fischer’s exact test) and seroma formation (1/30 vs. 8/30; p=0.02; Fischer’s exact test) compared to the onlay mesh group.Conclusions: Retromuscular prefascial mesh repair was equally effective but associated with fewer complications compared to onlay mesh repair.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Post-operative Complications in Primary Oral Cancer Surgery—a Prospective Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Divya ◽  
Nujum Zinia ◽  
P. G. Balagopal ◽  
Varghese T. Bipin ◽  
Iype Mathew Elizabeth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Is Onlay Polypropylene Mesh Repair an Available Option for Incisional Hernia Repair? A Retrospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Cano-Valderrama ◽  
JosÉ L. Porrero ◽  
Esther Quirós ◽  
Oscar Bonachia ◽  
MarÍA J. Castillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Polypropylene Mesh ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Hernia Recurrence ◽  
Onlay Mesh

Lately, incisional hernia repair (IHR) with onlay polypropylene mesh has been replaced by other surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the complication and recurrence rate after onlay mesh repair and other surgical procedures for IHR. A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent IHR in a single center was conducted. The data were obtained from electronic medical records. Patients who had been lost during follow-up were contacted for a visit in the clinic. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed with Stata 13.0 to analyze the factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence. Between June 2004 and December 2015, 1078 patients underwent IHR in a single center. Onlay mesh repair was performed in 125 patients (11.6%). Other surgical procedures included Rives procedure (29.3%), sublay mesh repair (38.6%), intrabdominal mesh repair (17.1%), and primary closure (3.4%). After a mean follow-up of 2.8 years, 73 (7%) patients developed a recurrence. A higher percentage of complications were seen after onlay mesh repair than after other surgical procedures (22.4% vs 13.1%, P = 0.005). Nevertheless, recurrence was less frequent after onlay mesh repair (4.2% vs 7.1%, P = 0.241). Logistic regression discarded an association between onlay mesh repair and hernia recurrence or postoperative complications. Incisional hernia repair with onlay polypropylene mesh repair was not associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications or recurrence rate. So, this procedure should not be discarded in selected patients presenting with incisional hernia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document