Cerebellar TMS Evokes a Long Latency Motor Response in the Hand during a Visually Guided Manual Tracking Task

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Hiraoka ◽  
Kenichi Horino ◽  
Atsuko Yagura ◽  
Akiyoshi Matsugi
2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 901-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Roitman ◽  
S. G. Massaquoi ◽  
K. Takahashi ◽  
T. J. Ebner

Segmentation of the velocity profiles into the submovements has been observed in reaching and tracking limb movements and even in isometric tasks. Submovements have been implicated in both feed-forward and feedback control. In this study, submovements were analyzed during manual tracking in the nonhuman primate with the focus on the amplitude-duration scaling of submovements and the error signals involved in their control. The task consisted of the interception and visually guided pursuit of a target moving in a circle. The submovements were quantified based on their duration and amplitude in the speed profile. Control experiments using passive movements demonstrated that these intermittencies were not instrumentation artifacts. Submovements were prominent in both the interception and tracking phases and their amplitude scaled linearly with duration. The scaling factors increased with tracking speed at the same rate for both interception and pursuit. A cross-correlation analysis between a variety of error signals and the speed profile revealed that direction and speed errors were temporally coupled to the submovements. The cross-correlation profiles suggest that submovements are initiated when speed error reaches a certain limit and when direction error is minimized. The scaling results show that in monkeys submovements characterize both the interception and pursuit portions of the task and that these submovements have similar scaling properties consistent with 1) the concept of stereotypy and 2) adding constant acceleration/force at a specific tracking speed. The correlation results show involvement of speed and direction error signals in controlling the submovements.


1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. 1424-1428
Author(s):  
William P. Janson ◽  
Gloria L. Calhoun

Past studies involving oculomotor responses have typically been limited to refixations along the horizontal plane, small sample sizes, and little data pertaining to head movement. The study reported herein addresses these data voids by collecting both eye and head latency data for refixations in the horizontal and vertical planes. The subjects' task was to perform a central manual tracking task while periodically responding to a verbal command to classify a target on one of four peripheral monitors. Two targets were displayed along the horizontal plane and two along the vertical plane. Results from 620 trials indicated similar trends for the eye and head latency across all four monitor locations, suggesting no significant differences in eye or head latency as a function of target plane.


2000 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. McC. Foulkes ◽  
R. Chris Miall

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunglae Lee ◽  
Eric J. Perreault

Abstract Responses elicited after the shortest latency spinal reflexes but prior to the onset of voluntary activity can display sophistication beyond a stereotypical reflex. Two distinct behaviors have been identified for these rapid motor responses, often called long-latency reflexes. The first is to maintain limb stability by opposing external perturbations. The second is to quickly release motor actions planned prior to the disturbance, often called a triggered reaction. This study investigated their interaction when motor tasks involve both limb stabilization and motor planning. We used a robotic manipulator to change the stability of the haptic environment during 2D arm reaching tasks, and to apply perturbations that could elicit rapid motor responses. Stabilizing reflexes were modulated by the orientation of the haptic environment (field effect) whereas triggered reactions were modulated by the target to which subjects were instructed to reach (target effect). We observed that there were no significant interactions between the target and field effects in the early (50–75 ms) portion of the long-latency reflex, indicating that these components of the rapid motor response are initially controlled independently. There were small but significant interactions for two of the six relevant muscles in the later portion (75–100 ms) of the reflex response. In addition, the target effect was influenced by the direction of the perturbation used to elicit the motor response, indicating a later feedback correction in addition to the early component of the triggered reaction. Together, these results demonstrate how distinct components of the long-latency reflex can work independently and together to generate sophisticated rapid motor responses that integrate planning with reaction to uncertain conditions.


Author(s):  
Tetsumasa Asano ◽  
Jun Izawa ◽  
Yutaka Sakaguchi

PLoS ONE ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e11189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Squeri ◽  
Lorenzo Masia ◽  
Maura Casadio ◽  
Pietro Morasso ◽  
Elena Vergaro

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 2660-2664 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Mushiake ◽  
P. L. Strick

1. We recorded the activity of dentate neurons while monkeys (n = 2) performed sequential pointing movements under two task conditions: visually guided and remembered. For both conditions, a monkey faced a panel with five touch pads. The animal began a trial by placing his right hand on a hold key in front of him. In the Remembered Sequence Task, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) over three touch pads were illuminated in a sequence as an instruction to the monkey. At the end of a variable instruction period, an auditory “Go” signal told the monkey to release the hold key and press the touch pads according to the instructed sequence. In the Tracking Task, the monkey was required to press three touch pads immediately after the LED over each of them was illuminated. 2. We recorded from 172 neurons in the dentate that showed task-related changes in activity during the reaction time (RT) period (i.e., the interval between the onset of the Go signal and the release of the hold key). Approximately 40% of these neurons were considered task-dependent because they displayed exclusive or enhanced (> +/- 50%) changes in peak activity during the RT period for one of the two task conditions. Almost 80% of the task-dependent neurons displayed exclusive or enhanced activity changes during the Tracking Task. Many of these neurons were located ventral and lateral to dentate neurons, which were not task-dependent. 3. These results suggest that a portion of the dentate nucleus is preferentially involved in the generation and/or guidance of movement based on visual cues.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document