Gravity and magnetic data analysis of block-35, Jiza' basin, Eastern Yemen

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3995-4007
Author(s):  
H. H. Ghazala ◽  
S. A. El-Gabry ◽  
A. A. Qahtan
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Magnetic Data ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic Data

Gravity and magnetic data analysis based on Poisson wavelet-transforms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirill Kuznetsov ◽  
Bulychev Andrey ◽  
Ivan Lygin
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Magnetic Fields ◽  
Potential Field ◽  
Wavelet Transforms ◽  
Geophysical Methods ◽  
Magnetic Data ◽  
Potential Field Data ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic Data ◽  
Poisson Wavelets

<p>Studies of the Earth’s interior structure are one of the most complex topics in modern science. Integration of different geophysical methods plays a key role in effectively tackling the problem. In the last decade capabilities of potential field geophysical methods have been increasing due to development of advanced digital technologies. Improved resolution and accuracy of gravity and magnetic fields measurements made by modern equipment makes it possible to build more detailed geological models. Different tectonic and structural elements being interpreted in such models produce potential field signals with different spectral characteristics. Like any geophysical signals, potential fields can be described as a spatially non-stationary signal. This means its frequency content may change depending on a given signal sample, in particular with different spatial location of a sample. In this case, approaches of gravity and magnetic fields analysis based on Fourier transform or signal decomposition into a number of harmonic functions can lead to incorrect results. One of the ways to solve this challenge involves using wavelet transform based algorithms, since these transforms do not assume stationary signals and each function of a wavelet-based basis is localized in space domain.</p><p>In gravity and magnetic data analysis it is beneficial to use wavelets based on partial derivatives of the Poisson kernel, which correspond to derivatives of a point source gravity potential. Application of Poisson wavelets in potential field data analysis has begun in the 1990's and is predominantly aimed at studying gravity and magnetic fields singularity points during data interpretation.</p><p>Similar to Fourier-based potential field techniques, it is possible to construct a number of data filtering algorithms based on Poisson wavelets. Current work demonstrates that it is possible to construct algorithms based on Poisson wavelets for transforming profile and spatially gridded gravity and magnetic data, e.g. for calculation of equivalent density and magnetization distributions, upward and downward continuations, reduction to pole and many other filters that take into account spatial distribution of the signal.</p><p>Wavelet-transforms allow to account for spatially non-stationary nature of geophysical signals. Use of wavelet based techniques allows to effectively carry out potential field data interpretation in a variety of different geologic and tectonic settings in a consistent fashion.</p>

Automatic 3-D interpretation of potential field data using analytic signal derivatives

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Debeglia ◽  
Jacques Corpel
Keyword(s):  
Signal Amplitude ◽  
Vertical Gradient ◽  
Analytic Signal ◽  
Magnetic Data ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Potential Field Data ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic ◽  
Second Derivatives ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic Data ◽  
Derivatives Of

A new method has been developed for the automatic and general interpretation of gravity and magnetic data. This technique, based on the analysis of 3-D analytic signal derivatives, involves as few assumptions as possible on the magnetization or density properties and on the geometry of the structures. It is therefore particularly well suited to preliminary interpretation and model initialization. Processing the derivatives of the analytic signal amplitude, instead of the original analytic signal amplitude, gives a more efficient separation of anomalies caused by close structures. Moreover, gravity and magnetic data can be taken into account by the same procedure merely through using the gravity vertical gradient. The main advantage of derivatives, however, is that any source geometry can be considered as the sum of only two types of model: contact and thin‐dike models. In a first step, depths are estimated using a double interpretation of the analytic signal amplitude function for these two basic models. Second, the most suitable solution is defined at each estimation location through analysis of the vertical and horizontal gradients. Practical implementation of the method involves accurate frequency‐domain algorithms for computing derivatives with an automatic control of noise effects by appropriate filtering and upward continuation operations. Tests on theoretical magnetic fields give good depth evaluations for derivative orders ranging from 0 to 3. For actual magnetic data with borehole controls, the first and second derivatives seem to provide the most satisfactory depth estimations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document