In reply: Mistaken concepts on the use of ancillary testing in brain death diagnosis

Author(s):  
Guillaume Plourde ◽  
Joel Neves Briard ◽  
Sam D. Shemie ◽  
Jai Jai Shiva Shankar ◽  
Michaël Chassé
2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 995
Author(s):  
GirijaP Rath ◽  
Siddharth Chavali ◽  
Deep Sengupta ◽  
SuryaK Dube

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanvir Rizvi ◽  
Prem Batchala ◽  
Sugoto Mukherjee

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Dawiskiba ◽  
Wojciech Wojtowicz ◽  
Badr Qasem ◽  
Marceli Łukaszewski ◽  
Karolina Anna Mielko ◽  
...  

Abstract There is a clear difference between severe brain damage and brain death. However, in clinical practice, the differentiation of these states can be challenging. Currently, there are no laboratory tools that facilitate brain death diagnosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of serum metabolomic analysis in differentiating coma patients (CP) from individuals with brain death (BD). Serum samples were collected from 23 adult individuals with established diagnosis of brain death and 24 patients in coma with Glasgow Coma Scale 3 or 4, with no other clinical symptoms of brain death for at least 7 days after sample collection. Serum metabolomic profiles were investigated using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The results obtained were examined by univariate and multivariate data analysis (PCA, PLS-DA, and OPLS-DA). Metabolic profiling allowed us to quantify 43 resonance signals, of which 34 were identified. Multivariate statistical modeling revealed a highly significant separation between coma patients and brain-dead individuals, as well as strong predictive potential. The findings not only highlight the potential of the metabolomic approach for distinguishing patients in coma from those in the state of brain death but also may provide an understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying these conditions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Savaş Altınsoy ◽  
Elif Şule Özdemir ◽  
İlkay Baran ◽  
Fatma Kavak Akelma ◽  
Mukaddes Tuğba Arslan ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Christophe Orban ◽  
Elodie Ferret ◽  
Patrick Jambou ◽  
Carole Ichai

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Kosieradzki ◽  
Anna Jakubowska-Winecka ◽  
Michal Feliksiak ◽  
Ilona Kawalec ◽  
Ewa Zawilinska ◽  
...  

Public attitude toward deceased donor organ recovery in Poland is quite positive, with only 15% opposing to donation of their own organs, yet actual donation rate is only 16/pmp. Moreover, donation rate varies greatly (from 5 to 28 pmp) in different regions of the country. To identify the barriers of organ donation, we surveyed 587 physicians involved in brain death diagnosis from regions with low (LDR) and high donation rates (HDR). Physicians from LDR were twice more reluctant to start diagnostic procedure when clinical signs of brain death were present (14% versus 5.5% physicians from HDR who would not diagnose death, resp.). Twenty-five percent of LDR physicians (as opposed to 12% of physicians from HDR) would either continue with intensive therapy or confirm brain death and limit to the so-called minimal therapy. Only 32% of LDR physicians would proceed with brain death diagnosis regardless of organ donation, compared to 67% in HDR. When donation was not an option, mechanical ventilation would be continued more often in LDR regions (43% versus 26.7%;P<0.01). In conclusion, low donation activity seems to be mostly due to medical staff attitude.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Dodd-Sullivan ◽  
Jamie Quirin ◽  
John Newhart

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document