Effect of Planned Follow-up on Married Women’s Health Beliefs and Behaviors Concerning Breast and Cervical Cancer Screenings

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahsan Kolutek ◽  
Ilknur Aydin Avci ◽  
Umit Sevig
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Jacobs ◽  
Paul J. Rathouz ◽  
Kelly Karavolos ◽  
Susan A. Everson-Rose ◽  
Imke Janssen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 19s-19s
Author(s):  
L.S. Savas ◽  
N.I. Heredia ◽  
S.P. Coan ◽  
M.E. Fernandez

Background: Underutilization of preventive breast and cervical cancer screenings contributes to later stage breast cancer diagnoses and lower survival rates, as well as higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality among Hispanics compared with non-Hispanic whites. To increase screening among medically underserved Hispanic women in urban settings, we adapted an evidence-based community health worker (CHW)-delivered screening education and referral intervention ( Cultivando la Salud) developed and evaluated among rural Mexican American migrant farmworkers. CHWs delivered the adapted intervention for Hispanics residing in Houston, Texas. The adaptation focused on intervention and implementation strategies, resulting in modifications, such as group education rather than one-on-one education and an expanded cancer prevention coaching and navigation intervention to remove barriers and facilitate access to care. Aim: We examined the effect of the adapted intervention on increasing Pap and mammography screenings. Methods: To assess effectiveness, we conducted a randomized controlled trial among nonadherent women based on American Cancer Society screening guidelines. CHWs recruited women in community settings using structured eligibility forms, and bilingual data collectors confirmed eligibility, consented women, and conducted telephone-based baseline and 6-month follow-up surveys. We conducted both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using logistic regression to evaluate intervention effect on mammogram and Pap completion. Covariates significant in univariate analyses ( P < 0.20) were included in the final models, and time to follow-up was adjusted in per protocol analyses. Results: We enrolled 1,025 women and randomized women to intervention and control (delayed intervention) groups. Among women followed-up, 39.9% received a mammogram in the intervention group compared with 20.3% in the control group ( P = 0.001) and 55.8% received a Pap screening in the intervention group compared with 27.4% in the control group ( P = 0.001). Women in the breast cancer screening intervention group had 2.02 increased odds of receiving a mammogram compared with women in the control group, based on the adjusted intent-to-treat analysis (adjusted OR=2.02, 95% CI: 1.42-2.87) and 2.17 time greater screening odds in the adjusted per protocol analysis (adjusted OR=2.17, 95% CI: 1.48-3.18). Women in the Pap screening intervention group had 1.84 increased odds of completing a Pap screening based on the adjusted intent-to-treat analysis (adjusted OR=1.85, 95% CI: 1.22-2.80) and 3.09 increased odds based on the adjusted per protocol analysis (adjusted OR=3.09, 95% CI: 1.88-5.08). Conclusion: This RCT intervention trial provides evidence that the adapted intervention effectively increased breast and cervical cancer screenings among underserved Hispanic women. Future intervention and implementation research to further strengthen the intervention effect is needed.


Author(s):  
Monica L. Kasting ◽  
David A. Haggstrom ◽  
Joy L. Lee ◽  
Stephanie L. Dickinson ◽  
Cleveland G. Shields ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudha R. Raman ◽  
Jeffrey S. Brown ◽  
Lesley H. Curtis ◽  
Kevin Haynes ◽  
James Marshall ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jayoung Han ◽  
Paiboon Jungsuwadee ◽  
Olufunmilola Abraham ◽  
Dongwoo Ko

We examined the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) on women’s adherence to breast and cervical cancer screenings and estimated the prevalence and adherence rate of screenings. The study used a descriptive cross-sectional design using the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) data collected by the National Cancer Institute. Adherence was defined based on the guidelines from the American Cancer Society and the composite measure of shared decision-making was constructed using three items in the data. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association between the SDM and adherence, controlling for cancer beliefs and socio-demographic variables. The analysis included 742 responses. Weighted to represent the U.S. population, 68.1% adhered to both breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines. The composite measure of SDM was reliable (α = 0.85), and a higher SDM score was associated with women’s screening adherence (b = 0.17; p = 0.009). There were still women who did not receive cancer screenings as recommended. The results suggest that the use of the SDM approach for healthcare professionals’ communication with patients can improve screening adherence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document