scholarly journals Efficacy Comparison of Preprandial and Postprandial Prandilin 25 Administration in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-213
Author(s):  
Yong Luo ◽  
Wen-ji Ni ◽  
BO Ding ◽  
Xiang-hong Xu ◽  
Lei Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Prandilin 25

scholarly journals Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Bing-li Liu ◽  
Guo-ping Yin ◽  
Feng-fei Li ◽  
Yun Hu ◽  
Jin-dan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Fasting Blood Glucose ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Glycemic Variations

Objective. To compare the effect of the rapid-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs) aspart (NovoRapid) and lispro (Prandilin) on glycemic variations by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in patients within newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and metformin intensive therapy. Methods. This is a single-blind randomized controlled trial. A total of 110 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) above 9% was hospitalized and randomly divided into two groups: group Asp (NovoRapid group) and group Lis (Prandilin group). They all received CSII and metformin therapy. Treatments were maintained for 2-3 weeks after the glycaemic target was reached. C-peptide and insulin and fructosamine were determined. CGMS was continuously applied for 4 days after reaching the glycemic target. Results. There were no significant differences in daily dosages of insulin, fasting plasma C-P and 2 h postprandial C-P and insulin, and fructosamine at the baseline and endpoint between the groups Asp and Lis. No significant differences were seen in the 24 h mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), 24 h mean blood glucose (MBG), the standard deviation of the MBG (SDBG), fasting blood glucose, number of glycemic excursion (NGE), and the incidence of hypoglycemia between the two groups. Similarly, no significant differences were found in areas under the curve (AUC) of glucose above 10.0 mmol/L or the decremental area over the curve (AOC) of glucose below 3.9 mmol/L between the two groups. Conclusions. Lispro and aspart had the similar ability to control the glycemic variations in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR-IPR-17010338.

924-P: Pattern Mining of Trajectories of Glucose Values of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System by Artificial Intelligence in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 924-P
Author(s):  
MASAKI MAKINO ◽  
RYO YOSHIMOTO ◽  
MIZUHO KONDO-ANDO ◽  
YASUMASA YOSHINO ◽  
IZUMI HIRATSUKA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Pattern Mining ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System ◽  
Diabetes Patients

Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring system during exercise in type 2 diabetes

2012 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. e36-e39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franciele R. Figueira ◽  
Daniel Umpierre ◽  
Jorge P. Ribeiro ◽  
Pedro S. Tetelbom ◽  
Nicoli T. Henn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document