Dynamic Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation Under Earthquake Force

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Indrajit Chowdhury ◽  
Shambhu P. Dasgupta
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Moch. Suaib Reiza ◽  
Agus Suhardono ◽  
Musa Pranadesta Manzra Surati

 The existing square tower of intake has 1,397.57m3 volume and using shallow foundation Logung Dam with its weight stability will cause inefficient structures and potential to earthquake force effect. It is necessary to have an alternative planning of the intake tower. The authors intends to redesign the intake with morning glory type and used bored pile; to find out the position of intake tower, dimension, reinforcement, duration, cost estimate, and to compare the redesign.The required data were of topographic map, irrigation, and raw water discharge, bearing capacity, and work unit price analysis of project 2016. Manning Method was applied to find out the dimension; Shell Slab Method with Column Approach to calculate the structure of the intake tower, and Skempton Method to calculate bearing capacity. The redesign results in the position of ∅ 1.75-m intake tower on conduit channel with 728,08 m3 volume; the dominant load of  operational-earthquake combination with different values; D22-200 steel bar for y-direction, D19-150 for x-direction on conduit channel, D19-150 for x,y-direction on intake tower segment 1, D16-150 for x,y-direction on intake tower segment 2, and D13-150 for x,y-direction on intake tower segment 3; on 105 workdays; at  a total cost of IDR 2,327,806,700 with 40.64 % efficiency cost. 


2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 450-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Y Zhu ◽  
C F Lee ◽  
K T Law

The Terzaghi superposition assumption has been widely used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow footings. Although this assumption always errs on the safe side, a rigorous procedure to calculate the bearing capacity is still of engineering value. This paper presents such a procedure that is free from errors as a result of the superposition assumption. It demonstrates that the ultimate bearing capacity can be precisely expressed by the Terzaghi equation, except that the bearing capacity factor Nγ is dependent upon the surcharge ratio. A recently developed numerical method, i.e., the critical slip field method, is used to calculate the modification coefficient for modifying Nγ. It is found that this modification coefficient increases with the surcharge ratio at small values of surcharge ratio and then remains constant for large values of surcharge ratio. However, the errors invoked by the superposition assumption do not exceed 10%. On the basis of numerical calculations, a simple closed-form expression of the modification coefficient is proposed that yields the theoretically rigorous ultimate bearing capacity. In the later part of the paper, errors in bearing capacity calculations owing to the use of conventional procedures are analyzed. It is concluded that the continued use of conventional procedures is justified, but the inherent errors should not be neglected in assessing the performance of shallow foundations.Key words: shallow foundation, strip footing, ultimate bearing capacity, critical slip field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document